Which of the following best reflects the attitude toward labor strikes presented in the image?

Try the new Google Books

Check out the new look and enjoy easier access to your favorite features

• Akkerman, A., Born, M. J., & Torenvlied, R. (2013). Solidarity, strikes, and scabs: How participation norms affect union members’ willingness to strike. Work and Occupations, 40(3), 250–280. https://doi.org/10.1177/0730888413481481

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Ashwin, S., & Clarke, S. (2002). Russian trade unions and industrial relations in transition. Palgrave. 

• Bajwa, N. ul H., & König, C. J. (2019). How much is research in the top journals of industrial/organizational psychology dominated by authors from the U.S.? Scientometrics, 120(3), 1147–1161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03180-2

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Barling, J., Fullagar, C., Kelloway, E. K., & McElvie, L. (1992). Union loyalty and strike propensity. Journal of Social Psychology, 132(5), 581–590. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1992.9713897

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Barling, J., & Milligan, J. (1987). Some psychological consequences of striking: A six month, longitudinal study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 8(2), 127–137. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030080204

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Beierlein, C., Kovaleva, A., Kemper, C. J., & Rammstedt, B. (2012). Ein Messinstrument zur Erfassung subjektiver Kompetenzerwartungen [An instrument to assess subjective control expectations: The general brief self-efficacy scale]. GESIS - Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften

• Bentler, P. M. (2010). SEM with simplicity and accuracy. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 20(2), 215–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2010.03.002

  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

• Bergman, M. E., & Jean, V. A. (2016). Where have all the “workers” gone? A critical analysis of the unrepresentativeness of our samples relative to the labor market in the industrial–organizational psychology literature. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 9(1), 84–113. https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2015.70

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Beutell, N. J., & Biggs, D. L. (1984). Behavioral intentions to join a union: Instrumentality × valence, locus of control, and strike attitudes. Psychological Reports, 55(1), 215–222. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1984.55.1.215

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Bewernitz, T., & Dribbusch, H. (2014). „Kein Tag ohne Streik“: Arbeitskampfentwicklung im Dienstleistungssektor ["No day without strike": Industrial action in the service sector]. WSI-Mitteilungen, 67(5), 393–401. https://doi.org/10.5771/0342-300X-2014-5-393

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Bok, D. C., & Dunlop, J. T. (1970). Labor and the American community. Simon and Schuster.

• Bundesagentur für Arbeit. (2019). Streikstatistik (Jahreszahlen)—Deutschland 2018 [Strike statistic (Annual numbers)—Germany 2018]. Statistik der Bundesagentur für Arbeit

• Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor. (2020, June 28). Major work stoppages: Detailed monthly listing 1993-present. Work Stoppages Involving 1,000 or More Workers, 1993–2019. Retrieved June 28, 2020, from https://www.bls.gov/web/wkstp/monthly-listing.htm

• Campolieti, M., Hebdon, R., & Hyatt, D. (2005). Strike incidence and strike duration: Some new evidence from Ontario. ILR Review, 58(4), 610–630. https://doi.org/10.1177/001979390505800405

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Cascio, W. F., & Aguinis, H. (2008). Research in industrial and organizational psychology from 1963 to 2007: Changes, choices, and trends. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(5), 1062–1081. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.5.1062

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Chaulk, K., & Brown, T. C. (2008). An assessment of worker reaction to their union and employer post-strike: A Canadian experience. Relations Industrielles, 63(2), 223–245. https://doi.org/10.7202/018574ar

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Chesto, J. (2019, September 29). Strike by trash collectors drags on into a sixth week. Boston Globe. Retrieved December 23, 2019, from https://www.bostonglobe.com/business/2019/09/23/south-shore-trash-strike-enters-its-fifth-week/ylMhAANj3dH0mo9eIfeHzI/story.html

• Christensen, P. T. (2017). Labor under Putin: The state of the Russian working class. New Labor Forum, 26(1), 64–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/1095796016682019.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Cohen, A. (1993). An empirical assessment of the multidimensionality of union participation. Journal of Management, 19(4), 749–773. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639301900402

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Erlbaum.

  Google Scholar 

• Day, A. L., Stinson, V., Catano, V. M., & Kelloway, E. K. (2006). Third-party attitudes and strain reactions to the threat of a labor strike. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 11(1), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.11.1.3

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Dinno, A. (2018). paran: Horn’s test of principal components/factors (R package version 1.5.2). https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=paran [Computer software]

• Dribbusch, H. (2016). Organizing through conflict: Exploring the relationship between strikes and union membership in Germany. Transfer, 22(3), 347–365. https://doi.org/10.1177/1024258916650423

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Wadsworth.

  Google Scholar 

• Epskamp, S. (2019). semPlot: Path diagrams and visual analysis of various SEM packages (R package version 1.1.2). https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=semPlot [Computer software].

• Fabrigar, L. R., & Wegener, D. T. (2012). Requirements for and decisions in choosing exploratory common factor analysis. In L. R. Fabrigar & D. T. Wegener (Eds.), Exploratory factor analysis (pp. 19–38). Oxford University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Fatke, M. (2019). The personality of populists: How the Big Five traits relate to populist attitudes. Personality and Individual Differences, 139, 138–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.11.018

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Fazio, R. H. (1989). On the power and functionality of attitudes: The role of attitude. In A. R. Pratkanis, S. J. Breckler, & A. G. Greenwald (Eds.), Attitude structure and function (pp. 153–179). Erlbaum.

  Google Scholar 

• Felfe, J., & Franke, F. (2012). Commitment-Skalen (COMMIT): Fragebogen zur Erfassung von Commitment gegenüber Organisation, Beruf/Tätigkeit, Team, Führungskraft und Beschäftigungsform [Commitment Scales (COMMIT): Questionnaire for recording commitment to organization, profession/activity, team, manager and form of employment]. Hans Huber.

• Fell, C. B., & König, C. J. (2016). Cross-cultural differences in applicant faking on personality tests: A 43-nation study. Applied Psychology, 65(4), 671–717. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12078

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Fox, J., Zhenghua, N., & Byrnes, J. (2017). sem: Structural equation models. (3.1–9) [R package version 3.1–9]. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=sem

• Fullagar, & Barling, J. (1989). A longitudinal test of a model of the antecedents and consequences of union loyalty. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(2), 213–227. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.74.2.213

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Gafni-Lachter, L., Admi, H., Eilon, Y., & Lachter, J. (2017). Improving work conditions through strike: Examination of nurses’ attitudes through perceptions of two physician strikes in Israel. Work, 57(2), 205–210. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-172560

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Gammarano, R. (2019). At least 44’000 work stoppages since 2010. ILOSTAT. Retrieved December 9, 2019, from https://ilostat.ilo.org/2019/11/04/at-least-44000-work-stoppages-since-2010/

• Gennard, J. (1982). The financial costs and returns of strikes. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 20(2), 247–256. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8543.1982.tb00101.x

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Goretzko, D., Pham, T. T. H., & Bühner, M. (2021). Exploratory factor analysis: Current use, methodological developments and recommendations for good practice. Current Psychology, 40(7), 3510–3521. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00300-2

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Göritz, A. S. (2014). Determinants of the starting rate and the completion rate in online panel studies. In M. Callegaro, R. Baker, J. Bethlehem, A. S. Göritz, J. A. Krosnick, & P. J. Lavrakas (Eds.), Online panel research: A data quality perspective (pp. 154–170). Wiley.

  Chapter  Google Scholar 

• Hayton, J. C., Allen, D. G., & Scarpello, V. (2004). Factor retention decisions in exploratory factor analysis: A tutorial on parallel analysis. Organizational Research Methods, 7(2), 191–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428104263675

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hinkin, T. R. (1995). A review of scale development practices in the study of organizations. Journal of Management, 21(5), 967–988. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639502100509

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hinkin, T. R. (1998). A brief tutorial on the development of measures for use in survey questionnaires. Organizational Research Methods, 1(1), 104–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442819800100106

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Homer, P. M., & Kahle, L. R. (1988). A structural equation test of the value-attitude-behavior hierarchy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(4), 638–646. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.4.638

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Huang, J. L., Curran, P. G., Keeney, J., Poposki, E. M., & DeShon, R. P. (2012). Detecting and deterring insufficient effort responding to surveys. Journal of Business and Psychology, 27(1), 99–114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-011-9231-8

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Huskinson, T. L., & Haddock, G. (2006). Individual differences in attitude structure and the accessibility of the affective and cognitive components of attitude. Social Cognition, 24(4), 453–468. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2006.24.4.453

  Article  Google Scholar 

• International Labour Organization (ILO). (1993). Resolution concerning statistics of strikes, lockouts and other action due to labour disputes. Fifteenth International Conference of Labour Statisticians. https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/---stat/documents/normativeinstrument/wcms_087544.pdf

• International Labour Organization. (2020). Work stoppages. ILOSTAT. https://ilostat.ilo.org/topics/work-stoppages/. Accessed 30 Jan 2020

• Jansen, G., Akkerman, A., & Vandaele, K. (2017). Undermining mobilization? The effect of job flexibility and job instability on the willingness to strike. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 38(1), 99–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143831X14559782.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Jarley, P., & Kuruvilla, S. (1994). American trade unions and public approval: Can unions please all of the people all of the time? Journal of Labor Research, 15(2), 97–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02685724.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Johnes, G. (1985). Error removal, loss reduction and external effects in the theory of strikes. Australian Economic Papers, 24(45), 310–325. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8454.1985.tb00119.x.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Johnson, J. A. (2005). Ascertaining the validity of individual protocols from web-based personality inventories. Journal of Research in Personality, 39(1), 103–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2004.09.009.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Jorgensen, T. D., Pornprasertmanit, S., Schoemann, A. M., & Rosseel, Y. (2019). semTools: Useful tools for structural equation modeling (R package version 0.5–2) [Computer software]. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=semTools

• Jost, J. T., Becker, J., Osborne, D., & Badaan, V. (2017). Missing in (collective) action: Ideology, system justification, and the motivational antecedents of two types of protest behavior. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26(2), 99–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417690633.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Jost, J. T., Chaikalis-Petritsis, V., Abrams, D., Sidanius, J., Van Der Toorn, J., & Bratt, C. (2012). Why men (and women) do and don’t rebel: Effects of system justification on willingness to protest. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(2), 197–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211422544.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Jost, J. T., Nosek, B. A., & Gosling, S. D. (2008). Ideology: Its resurgence in social, personality, and political psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(2), 126–136. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2008.00070.x.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Judge, T. A., & Kammeyer-Mueller, J. D. (2012). Job attitudes. Annual Review of Psychology, 63(1), 341–367. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100511.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Kelley, K. (2019). MBESS: The MBESS R Package (4.6.0) [Computer software]. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=MBESS

• Kelloway, E. K., Francis, L., Catano, V. M., & Dupré, K. E. (2008). Third-party support for strike action. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(4), 806–817. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.4.806.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kerr, W., Armstrong, C., & Herman, J. (1957). Some correlates of attitudes on the 1956 steel strike. Journal of Applied Psychology, 41(3), 169–169. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0044287.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Klandermans, B. (1986). Psychology and trade union participation: Joining, acting, quitting. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 59(3), 189–204. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1986.tb00224.x.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kollmeyer, C. (2018). Trade union decline, deindustrialization, and rising income inequality in the United States, 1947 to 2015. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 57, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rssm.2018.07.002.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• König, C. J., Klehe, U.-C., Berchtold, M., & Kleinmann, M. (2010). Reasons for being selective when choosing personnel selection procedures. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 18(1), 17–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2389.2010.00485.x.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Langer, M., & König, C. J. (2018). Introducing and testing the Creepiness of Situation Scale (CRoSS). Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2220. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02220.

  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

• Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. Springer.

  Google Scholar 

• Liepmann, D., Dunckel, H., & Welke, R. (1984). Betriebliche und gewerkschaftliche Wertorientierung bei jugendlichen Arbeitnehmern: Die Entwicklung eines Instrumentariums [Company and trade union value orientation among young workers: The development of a set of instruments]. In A. Stiksrud (Ed.), Jugend und Werte: Aspekte einer politischen Psychologie des Jugendalters (Vol. 7, pp. 300–310). Beltz.

• Lightman, E. S. (1983). Social workers, strikes, and service to clients. Social Work, 28(2), 142–147. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/28.2.142.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Lozano, L. M., García-Cueto, E., & Muñiz, J. (2008). Effect of the number of response categories on the reliability and validity of rating scales. Methodology, 4(2), 73–79. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-2241.4.2.73.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Lozier, G. G., & Mortimer, K. P. (1976). A collective bargaining election: Issues and faculty voting behavior. Research in Higher Education, 4(2), 193–208. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00991385.

• Martin, J. E., & Sinclair, R. R. (2001). A multiple motive perspective on strike propensities. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22(4), 387–407. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.93.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Martin, M., & Ahlswede, E. (2019). German union extends strike at Amazon’s Leipzig warehouse until December 24. The New York Times. Retrieved December 23, 2019, from https://www.nytimes.com/reuters/2019/12/20/business/20reuters-amazon-germany-strike.html

• McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. Jr. (1999). A five-factor theory of personality. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 139–153). Guilford Press

• McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. Jr. (2008). Empirical and theoretical status of the five-factor model of personality traits. In G. J. Boyle, G. Matthews, & D. H. Saklofske (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of personality theory and assessment: Vol. 1—Personality theories and models (pp. 273–294). SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849200462.n13

• McShane, S. L. (1986). General union attitude: A construct validation. Journal of Labor Research, 7, 403–417. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03179668.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Meade, A. W., & Craig, S. B. (2012). Identifying careless responses in survey data. Psychological Methods, 17(3), 437–455. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028085.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Mellor, S. (1990). The relationship between membership decline and union commitment: A field study of local unions in crisis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(3), 258–267. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.75.3.258.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363. https://doi.org/10.1086/226550.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Molinsky, A., & Margolis, J. (2005). Necessary evils and interpersonal sensitivity in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 30(2), 245–268. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2005.16387884.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Muncer, S. J., & Ling, J. (2006). Psychometric analysis of the empathy quotient (EQ) scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 40(6), 1111–1119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.09.020.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Nicholson, N., & Kelly, J. (1980). The psychology of strikes. Journal of Occupational Behaviour, 1(4), 275–284.

  Google Scholar 

• Niessen, A. S. M., Meijer, R. R., & Tendeiro, J. N. (2016). Detecting careless respondents in web-based questionnaires: Which method to use? Journal of Research in Personality, 63, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2016.04.010.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Nossiter, A. (2019, December 5). General strike in France challenges Macron’s latest ambition for change. The New York Times. Retrieved December 9, 2019, from https://www.nytimes.com/2019/12/05/world/europe/france-strike-macron.html

• O’Connor, B. P. (2020). paramap: Exploratory factor analysis functions for assessing dimensionality (R package version 1.9.3) [Computer software]

• Oliver, C. (1991). Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 145–179. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1991.4279002.

• Perry, C. R. (1987). Union corporate campaigns. University of Pennsylvania Press

• Poutvaara, P., Nikolka, T., Leithold, D., Oesingmann, K., & Wech, D. (2017). Comparative study about the powers and the representativeness of employee representatives in French and German enterprises. ifo Forschungsberichte

• R Core Team. (2019). R: A language and environment for statistical computing (3.6.1) [Computer software]. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/

• Reio, T. G., & Shuck, B. (2015). Exploratory factor analysis: Implications for theory, research, and practice. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 17(1), 12–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422314559804.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Revelle, W. (2021). psych: Procedures for Personality and Psychological Research (R package version 2.1.9). Northwestern University Evanston. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psych [Computer software]

• Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(i02), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Ruggs, E. N., Law, C., Cox, C. B., Roehling, M. V., Wiener, R. L., Hebl, M. R., & Barron, L. (2013). Gone fishing: I-O psychologists’ missed opportunities to understand marginalized employees’ experiences with discrimination. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 6(1), 39–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/iops.12007.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Sakamoto, Y., Ishiguro, M., & Kitagawa, G. (1986). Akaike information criterion statistics. Reidel.

  Google Scholar 

• Scales, A., Kelloway, E. K., & Francis, L. (2014). Over the line: Managers’ experience of a labour strike. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences / Revue Canadienne Des Sciences De L’administration, 31(3), 175–186. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjas.1289.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Schaffer, B. S., & Riordan, C. M. (2003). A review of cross-cultural methodologies for organizational research: A best-practices approach. Organizational Research Methods, 6(2), 169–215.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Shapira, Z., & Bass, B. M. (1975). Settling strikes in real life and simulations in North America and different regions of Europe. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60(4), 466–471. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076920.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Staff, T. N. H. (2019). This stinks! Greek sanitation worker strike brings garbage piles. The National Herald. Retrieved December 23, 2019, from https://www.thenationalherald.com/265519/this-stinks-greek-sanitation-worker-strike-brings-garbage-piles/

• Stagner, R. (1948). Psychological aspects of industrial conflict: I. Perception. Personnel Psychology, 1(2), 131–143. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1948.tb01301.x.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Stagner, R. (1956). Psychology of industrial conflict. Wiley.

  Google Scholar 

• Stagner, R., & Rosen, H. (1965). The psychology of union-management relations. Wadsworth.

  Google Scholar 

• Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In J. T. Jost & J. Sidanius (Eds.), Political psychology: Key readings (pp. 276–293). Psychology Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Tivendell, J., & Watson, C. (1995). Attitudes towards unions as predictors of actual strike behaviour. Ergonomics, 38(3), 534–538. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139508925125.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Topham, G. (2019, September 4). Ryanair pilots in UK to strike for further seven days in row over pay. The Guardian. Retrieved December 12, 2019, from https://www.theguardian.com/business/2019/sep/04/ryanair-pilots-uk-strike-september

• Ullman, J. B. (2013). Structural equation modeling. In B. Tabachnick & L. S. Fidell (Eds.), Using multivariate statistics (6th ed., pp. 731–836). Allyn & Bacon

• Verplanken, B., Hofstee, G., & Janssen, H. J. (1998). Accessibility of affective versus cognitive components of attitudes. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28(1), 23–35. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199801/02)28:1%3C23::AID-EJSP843%3E3.0.CO;2-Z.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Waas, B. (2012). Strike as a fundamental right of the workers and its risks of conflicting with other fundamental rights of the citizens. XX World Congress of the International Society for Labour and Social Security Law, Santiago de Chile, 1–88. Retrieved October 12 , 2020, fromhttp://islssl.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Strike-Waas.pdf

• Weiss, H. M. (2002). Deconstructing job satisfaction: Separating evaluations, beliefs and affective experiences. Human Resource Management Review, 12(2), 173–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-4822(02)00045-1.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Weiss, H. M., & Cropanzano, R. (1996). Affective events theory: A theoretical discussion of the structure, causes and consequences of affective experiences at work. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.). Research in Organizational Behavior, 18, 1–74. JAI Press

• Yentes, R. D., & Wilhelm, F. (2018). careless: Procedures for computing indices of careless responding (R package version 1.1.3) [Computer software]

• Zucker, L. G. (1977). American Sociological Review, 42(5), 726–743. https://doi.org/10.2307/2094862.

Page 2

From: Ever Thought About Strikes? Development of a Scale to Assess Attitudes and Behavioral Reactions to Strikes

1. pA positive affect, neuA neutral affect, negA negative affect, pC positive cognition, nC negative cognition, pB positive behavior, neuB neutral behavior, negB negative behavior
2. Numbers in bold = loadings above .30