What is a high priority assignment in an emergency department when a nurse is providing care for clients during a mass casualty?

  1. Moskop JC, Sklar DP, Geiderman JM, Schears RM, Bookman KJ: Emergency department crowding, part 1- concept, causes, and moral consequences. Ann Emerg Med. 2009, 53 (5): 605-11. 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.09.019.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Australasian College for Emergency Medicine: Policy document -- standard terminology. Emerg Med (Fremantle). 2002, 14: 337-340.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Carrus B, Corbett S, Kandelwai D: A hospital-wide strategy for fixing ED overcrowding. Health International. 2009, 9: 6-17.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Carret ML, Fassa AC, Domingues MR: Inappropriate use of emergency services: a systematic review of prevalence and associated factors. Cad Saude Publica. 2009, 25 (1): 7-28. 10.1590/S0102-311X2009000100002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ben-Isaac E, Schrager SM, Keefer M, Chen AY: National profile of nonemergent pediatric emergency department visits. Pediatrics. 2010, 125 (3): 454-9. 10.1542/peds.2009-0544. Epub 2010 Feb 1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sturm JJ, Hirsh DA, Lee EK, Massey R, Weselman B, Simon HK: Practice characteristics that influence nonurgent pediatric emergency department utilization. Acad Pediatr. 2010, 10 (1): 70-4. 10.1016/j.acap.2009.10.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gentile S, Vignally P, Durand AC, Gainotti S, Sambuc R, Gerbeaux P: Nonurgent patients in the emergency department? A French formula to prevent misuse. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010, 10: 66-10.1186/1472-6963-10-66.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Domres B, Koch M, Manger A, Becker HD: Ethics and triage. Prehospital Disaster Med. 2001, 16: 53-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Iserson KV, Moskop JC: Triage in medicine, Part I: Concept, history and types. Ann Emerg Med. 2007, 49 (3): 275-81. 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.05.019.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Moskop JC, Iserson KV: Triage in medicine, part II: Underlying values and principles. Ann Emerg Med. 2007, 49 (3): 282-7. 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.07.012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hartman RG: Tripartite triage concerns: issues for law and ethics. Crit Care Med. 2003, 31 (suppl): S358-S361. 10.1097/01.CCM.0000065130.18337.05.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF: Principles of Biomedical Ethics. 2009, New York: Oxford University Press, 6

    Google Scholar 

  13. Anderson-Shaw L, Ahrens W, Fetzer M: Ethics Consultation in the Emergency Department. JONA's Healthcare Law, Ethics, and Regulation. 2007, 9 (1): 32-35. 10.1097/01.NHL.0000262491.15783.cd.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bell NK: Triage in medical practices: an unacceptable model?. Soc Sci Med F. 1981, 15 (4): 151-6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Robertson-Steel I: Evolution of triage systems. Emerg Med J. 2006, 23 (2): 154-5. 10.1136/emj.2005.030270.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Bodansky DMS: Ethical dilemmas in triage: a perspective from the Jewish philosophical tradition. Ethics & Medicine: an international journal of Bioethics. 2009, 25 (1): 49-56.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mackway-Jones K, Marsden J, Windle J: Emergency Triage: Manchester Triage Group. 2006, BMJ Book. Blackwell Publishing Limited, 2

    Google Scholar 

  18. SAEM Ethics Committee (Society for Academic Emergency Medicine): Ethics of emergency department triage: SAEM position statement. Acad Emerg Med. 1995, 2 (11): 990-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Weinerman ER, Ratner RS, Robbins A, Lavenhar MA: Yale studies in ambulatory care V: determinants of use of hospital emergency services. Am J Public Health. 1966, 56: 1037-1056. 10.2105/AJPH.56.7.1037.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Jones J, Playforth MJ: The effect of the introduction of NHS Direct on requests for telephone triage advice from an accident and emergency department. Emergency Medicine Journal. 2001, 18: 300-301. 10.1136/emj.18.4.300.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Thompson AK, Faith K, Gibson JL, Upshur RE: Pandemic influenza preparedness: an ethical framework to guide decision-making. BMC Med Ethics. 2006, 7: E12-10.1186/1472-6939-7-12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Christian MD, Hawryluck L, Wax RS, Cook T, Lazar NM, Herridge MS, Muller MP, Gowans DR, Fortier W, Burkle FM: Development of a triage protocol for critical care during an influenza pandemic. CMAJ. 2006, 175 (11): 1377-81. 10.1503/cmaj.060911.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Verweij M: Moral principles for allocating scarce medical resources in an influenza pandemic. Bioethical Inquiry. 2009, 6: 159-169. 10.1007/s11673-009-9161-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Society of Critical Care Medicine Ethics Committee: Consensus statement on the triage of critically ill patients. JAMA. 1994, 271: 1200-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Travers DA, Waller AE, Bowling JM, Flowers D, Tintinalli J: Five-level triage system more effective than three-level in tertiary emergency department. J Emerg Nurs. 2002, 28 (5): 395-400. 10.1067/men.2002.127184.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Wuerz RC, Milne LW, Eitel DR, Travers D, Gilboy N: Reliability and validity of a new five-level triage instrument. Acad Emerg Med. 2000, 7 (3): 236-42. 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2000.tb01066.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Gilboy N, Tanabe P, Travers DA, Rosenau AM, Eitel DR: Emergency Severity Index, Version 4: Implementation Handbook. 2005, AHRQ Publication No. 05-0046-2. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

    Google Scholar 

  28. Cronin JG: The introduction of the Manchester triage scale to an emergency department in the Republic of Ireland. Accid Emerg Nurs. 2003, 11 (2): 121-5. 10.1016/S0965-2302(02)00218-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Zimmermann PG: The case for a universal, valid, reliable 5-tier triage acuity scale for US emergency departments. J Emerg Nurs. 2001, 27 (3): 246-54. 10.1067/men.2001.115284.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Bullard MJ, Unger B, Spence J, Grafstein E, CTAS National Working Group: Revisions to the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) adult guidelines. CJEM. 2008, 10 (2): 136-51.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Warren DW, Jarvis A, LeBlanc L, Gravel J, CTAS National Working Group, Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians, National Emergency Nurses Affiliation, Association des Médecins d'Urgence du Québec, Canadian Paediatric Society, Society of Rural Physicians of Canada: Revisions to the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale paediatric guidelines (PaedCTAS). CJEM. 2008, 10 (3): 224-43.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Yousif K, Bebbington J, Foley B: Impact on patients triage distribution utilizing the Australasian Triage Scale compared with its predecessor the National Triage Scale. Emerg Med Australas. 2005, 17 (5-6): 429-33. 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2005.00773.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Wallis LA, Gottschalk SB, Wood D, Bruijns S, Vries S, Balfour C: The Cape Triage Score - a triage system for South Africa. S Afr Med J. 2006, 96: 53-56.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Travers DA: Triage: How long does it take? How long should it take?. J Emerg Nurs. 1999, 25 (3): 238-40. 10.1016/S0099-1767(99)70213-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Lerner E Brooke, Schwartz Richard, Coule Phillip, Weinstein Eric, Cone David, Hunt Richard, Sasser Scott, Liu J Marc, Nudell Nikiah, Wedmore Ian, Hammond Jeffrey, Bulger Eileen, Salomone Jeffrey, Sanddal Teri, Lord Graydon, Markenson David, O'Connor Robert: Mass Casualty Triage: An Evaluation of the Data and Development of a Proposed National Guideline. Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2008, 2 (Suppl 1): S25-S34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Larkin GL, Arnold J: Ethical considerations in emergency planning, preparedness, and response to acts of terrorism. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2003, 18 (3): 170-8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Kellermann AL, Isakov AP, Parker R, Handrigan MT, Foldy S: Web-based self-triage of influenza-like illness during the 2009 H1N1 influenza pandemic. Ann Emerg Med. 2010, 56 (3): 288-294. 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.04.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Sacco WJ, Navin DM, Waddell RK, Fiedler KE, Long WB, Buckman RF: A new resource-constrained triage method applied to victims of penetrating injury. J Trauma. 2007, 63 (2): 316-25. 10.1097/TA.0b013e31806bf212.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Jecker NS, Reich WT: Contemporary Ethics of care. Encyclopedia of bioethics. Edited by: Post SG. 2004, New York: Macmillan, 367-74.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Held V: The ethics of care: personal, political and global. 2006, Oxford: Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  41. Gastmans C: The care perspective in health care ethics. Essentials of Teaching and Learning in Nursing Ethics: Perspectives and methods. Edited by: Davis A, Tchudin V, de Raeve L. 2006, Elsevier, Edinburgh, 135-148.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Vanlaere L, Gastmans C: A Personalist Approach to Care Ethics. Nursing Ethics. 2011, 18: 161-173. 10.1177/0969733010388924.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Gilligan C: In a different voice: psychological theory and women's development. 1982, Cambridge: Harvard University Press

    Google Scholar 

  44. Tronto J: Moral Boundaries, a Political Argument for an Ethic of Care. 1993, Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  45. American College of Emergency Physicians: Definition of an emergency service. Ann Emerg Med. 1991, 23: 1397-

    Google Scholar 

  46. Lowe RA, Bindman AB, Ulrich SK, Norman G, Scaletta TA, Keane D, Washington D, Grumbach K: Refusing care to emergency department of patients: evaluation of published triage guidelines. Ann Emerg Med. 1994, 23 (2): 286-93. 10.1016/S0196-0644(94)70042-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Kottow M: The battering of informed consent. J Med Ethics. 2004, 30: 565-569. 10.1136/jme.2003.002949.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Leung WC: Consent to treatment in the A&E department. Accid Emerg Nurs. 2002, 10 (1): 17-25. 10.1054/aaen.2001.0303.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Davis MA, Hoffman JR, Hsu J: Impact of patient acuity on preference for information and autonomy in decision making. Acad Emerg Med. 1999, 6 (8): 781-5. 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1999.tb01206.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Rhodes KV, Vieth T, He T, Miller A, Howes DS, Bailey O, Walter J, Frankel R, Levinson W: Resuscitating the physician-patient relationship: emergency department communication in an academic medical center. Ann Emerg Med. 2004, 44 (3): 262-7. 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2004.02.035.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Gillon R: Medical ethics: four principles plus attention to scope. BMJ. 1994, 309 (6948): 184-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Goransson KE, Rosen AV: Patient experience of the triage encounter in a Swedish emergency department. Int Emerg Nursing. 2010, 18: 36-40. 10.1016/j.ienj.2009.10.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Knopp R, Rosenzweig S, Bernstein E, Totten V: Physician-patient communication in the emergency department, part 1. Acad Emerg Med. 1996, 3 (11): 1065-9. 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1996.tb03357.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Altevogt BM, Stroud C, Hanson SL, Hanfling D, Gostin LO: Guidance for Establishing Crisis Standards of Care for Use in Disaster Situations: A Letter Report. 2009, Committee on Guidance for Establishing Standards of Care for Use in Disaster Situations; Institute of Medicine

    Google Scholar 

  55. Bernstein SL, Aronsky D, Duseja R, Epstein S, Handel D, Hwang U, McCarthy M, John McConnell K, Pines JM, Rathlev N, Schafermeyer R, Zwemer F, Schull M, Asplin BR, SAEM Emergency Department Crowding Task Force: The effect of emergency department crowding on clinically oriented outcomes. Acad Emerg Med. 2009, 16: 1-10. 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00295.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Cooke T, Watt D, Wertzler W, Quan H: Patient expectations of emergency department care: phase II - a cross-sectional survey. Can J Emerg Med. 2006, 8 (3): 148-57.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Hodge AN, Marshall AP: Violence and aggression in the emergency department: A critical care perspective. Aust Crit Care. 2007, 20: 61-67. 10.1016/j.aucc.2007.03.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Crilly J, Chaboyer W, Creedy D: Violence towards emergency department nurses by patients. Accid Emerg Nurs. 2004, 12: 67-73. 10.1016/j.aaen.2003.11.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Ekwall A, Gerdtz M, Manias E: The influence of patient acuity on satisfaction with emergency care: perspectives of family, friends and carers. J Clin Nurs. 2008, 17 (6): 800-9. 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.02052.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Cook Charles, Muscarella Peter, Praba Anant, Melvin W Scott, Martin Larry: Reducing Overtriage Without Compromising Outcomes in Trauma Patients. Arch Surg. 2001, 136: 752-756. 10.1001/archsurg.136.7.752.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Hupert Nathaniel, Hollingsworth Eric, Xiong Wei: Is Overtriage Associated With Increased Mortality? Insights From a Simulation Model of Mass Casualty Trauma Care. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2007, 1: S14-S24. 10.1097/DMP.0b013e31814cfa54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Armstrong JH, Hammond J, Hirshberg A, Frykberg ER: Is overtriage associated with increased mortality? The evidence says "yes". Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2008, 2 (1): 4-5. 10.1097/DMP.0b013e31816476c0. author reply 5-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Chung JYM: An exploration of accident and emergency nurse experiences of triage decision making in Hong Kong. Accid Emerg Nurs. 2005, 13: 206-213. 10.1016/j.aaen.2005.08.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Persad G, Wertheimer A, Emanuel EJ: Principles for allocation of scarce medical interventions. The Lancet. 2009, 373: 423-431. 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60137-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Dworkin R: Sovereign Virtue. The Theory and Practice of Equality. 2000, Cambridge: Harvard University Press

    Google Scholar 

  66. American College of Emergency Physicians: Non-beneficial ("Futile") emergency medical interventions. (Accessed: February 2, 2010)., [http://www.ecu.acep.org/webportal/PracticeResources/PolicyStatements/ethics/NonbeneficialFutileEMinterventions.htm]

  67. Sevenhuijsen S: Citizenship and the ethics of care: feminist considerations on justice, morality and politics. 1998, London: Routledge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  68. Gastmans C, Dierckx de Casterlé B, Schotsmans P: Nursing considered as a moral practice: a philosophical-ethical interpretation of nursing. The Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal. 1998, 8: 43-69. 10.1353/ken.1998.0002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. van Hooft S: Acting from the virtue of caring in nursing. Nursing Ethics. 1999, 6: 192-193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Widdershoven G: Care, cure, and interpersonal understanding. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 1999, 29: 1163-1169. 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1999.00985.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Verkerk M: A Care perspective on coercion and autonomy. Bioethics. 1999, 13: 358-369. 10.1111/1467-8519.00163.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Gatens-Robinson E: A defence of women's choice: abortion and the ethics of care. Southern Journal of Philosophy. 1992, 30: 39-66. 10.1111/j.2041-6962.1992.tb00637.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Loots C: Expecting a child with a disability: clinical ethical reflections on prenatal diagnosis and selective abortion. Between Technology and Humanity: the impact of technology on health care ethics. Edited by: Gastmans C. 2002, Leuven: Leuven University Press, 81-94.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Lindemann K: The ethics of receiving. Theoretical Medicine. 2003, 24: 501-509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Parks J: Envisioning a kinder, gentler world: on recognition and remuneration of care workers. Theoretical Medicine. 2003, 24: 489-499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Gastmans C, De Lepeleire J: Living to the bitter end? A personalist approach to euthanasia in persons with severe dementia. Bioethics. 2010, 24: 78-86. 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00708.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Edwards SD: Three versions of an ethics of care. Nurs Philos. 2009, 10 (4): 231-240. 10.1111/j.1466-769X.2009.00415.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Reiser SJ: The ethical life of health care organizations. Hastings Cent Rep. 1994, 24 (6): 28-35. 10.2307/3563464.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 


Page 2

System Countries Levels Patient should be seen by provider within
Australasian Triage Scale (ATS) Australia 1 - Resuscitation Level 1 - 0 minutes
  New Zealand 2 - Emergency Level 2 - 10 minutes
   3 - Urgent Level 3 - 30 minutes
   4 - Semi-urgent Level 4 - 60 minutes
   5 - Nonurgent Level 5 - 120 minutes
Manchester England 1 - Immediate (red) Level 1 - 0 minutes
  Scotland 2 - Very urgent (orange) Level 2 - 10 minutes
   3 - Urgent (yellow) Level 3 - 60 minutes
   4 - Standard (green) Level 4 - 120 minutes
   5 - Nonurgent (blue) Level 5 - 240 minutes
Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale(CTAS) Canada 1 - Resuscitation Level 1 - 0 minutes
   2 - Emergent Level 2 - 15 minutes
   3 - Urgent Level 3 - 30 minutes
   4 - Less urgent Level 4 - 60 minutes
   5 - Nonurgent Level 5 - 120 minutes

  1. Table 2-2 Five-level Triage Systems