Show Hoists provide a way to transfer somebody with limited mobility without putting unnecessary strain on the carer or the person being moved. This is a broad overview of the different types of hoist available. Click the links to go straight to each topic: Ceiling hoists It is always advisable to seek independent advice before buying any hoists or manual handling equipment to ensure you make an informed and sensible choice. It is strongly advised that you contact your local social services and seek advice from a professional such as an Occupational Therapist, as they should be able to undertake a full assessment, and provide and maintain the appropriate equipment, as well as providing the carer with all the training required. One common complaint raised against hoists is that they take too long to use. Carers often say they instead prefer just to lift the person themselves. This can often be because the person using the hoist is unfamiliar with the equipment or because it is unsuitable for the task. This can normally be easily addressed by the provision of the right equipment and thorough training and support in its use. Ultimately the aim of using any manual handling equipment should be to reduce the risk of an injury to the lowest level possible. We have a helpful series of questions to ask before choosing handling equipment here Top of page Ceiling track hoistsTraditional ceiling hoists run along permanently fixed tracks, so they offer less flexibility in use than a mobile system. On the other hand, they do not occupy floor space as a mobile hoist does, and they may be operated by the user independently – which is not possible with any floor standing system.They are generally less arduous for a carer to operate than a mobile hoist, and are the more suitable for longer distance transfers. In selecting a system, thought also needs to be given to structural considerations: ceiling joists may need to be reinforced, and doorways altered, to accommodate the track. Ceiling track systems may either have a permanently fixed hoist or a portable one, that can be detached and carried by the operator to be used on another track elsewhere in the building: particularly useful in nursing home environments. The hoist unit may be quite heavy to move around though – portability is a relative concept!Many ceiling track systems are powered by mains electricity for the transfer, with either a manual or powered raising and lowering mechanism.There will either be a battery back-up for emergencies, or a manual wind-down facility, to enable the client to be lowered to a flat surface. Alternatively, the system may be powered by rechargeable batteries – which is useful in that it is independent of the power supply, and also removes the need for a cable running along the track to provide power to the hoist from the mains. The disadvantage is that the batteries need to be kept well charged up, by returning them to their charging point at the end of the track – and it is quite easy to forget to do this. Both the ceiling hoists shown here have been designed to be easily attached and detached from the track, so that they can be moved from room to room as required. Top of page Portable overhead hoists (Gantry hoists)A more portable alternative to a ceiling track hoist is also available, in the form of a portable hoist and gantry arrangement, such as the one shown on the left.This is particularly suitable for situations where a hoist is required in a particular place for a short amount of time: when a disabled person is travelling, for example, or perhaps for use by health professionals working in the community. Top of page Mobile hoistsBeing self-contained units, mobile hoists don’t require any track installation, so offer more flexibility of use. They do, however, demand more of the carer, and are really not designed for moving people long distances: a wheelchair or showerchair is better for this, or a ceiling track hoist (above).In selecting a mobile hoist, thought needs to be given to the environment where it will be used: whether there is enough room to manoeuvre it into the right position; if the legs of the hoist will fit under or around any furniture, such as bed, bath or chair; whether the floor surface is smooth enough to allow it to operate easily: thick carpet or threshold strips are difficult to move over. It is also important to check that they have sufficient operating range to lift the person clear of any surface, and perhaps also to pick them up from floor level in an emergency. They also need to be stored when not in use, preferably in an area where they are out of the way, and with a charging point for their battery. There are smaller mobile hoists with narrower bases which are easier to move in more confined areas. These have a maximum load of perhaps 20 stone (100 kg) or a bit more, and are useful in the domestic environment. Larger hoists which are capable of lifting up to 40 stone (250 kg) give more flexible hoisting in hospital and nursing home situations with a range of patients and more space to work with. We have an article here about choosing the right hoist for a garden spa or hot tub Top of page
Is double handed care always necessary?Some interesting research came my way, on the subject of safe moving and handling. Undertaken by the University of Salford, the remit of the report was to challenge the widely received wisdom that two people are required in a situation where someone needs manual handling, i.e. double handed care. Safe manual handling is one of those topics that comes up a lot on Independent Living; we get emails from family carers who are struggling to move their loved ones from bed to chair or loo unaided, quite frequently contrasting this with care workers refusing to help with transfers unless there are two of them – and not always even then, as in this account:
Update September 2018Although this article was written a few years ago, the myth about requiring two people for every transfer still persists. We have an interesting contribution from Declan Barry, moving and handling trainer, who shares his experience of why this might be. Do please add your own thoughts after reading! Poor quality training in moving and handlingFrom the other side of the fence, people coming into employment in the care industry are sometimes dismayed at the sketchy nature of the moving and handling training they are provided with, as in this case:
Compulsory training, but no quality standards specifiedManual handling training is compulsory for care workers, but the content and quality of the training is left to the professional judgement of the organisation involved, leading to some very dubious courses, which may provide incorrect or misleading information, or just not enough time and practical sessions to enable the trainees to feel confident in their abilities. Given all the noise around “Health and Safety”, we should perhaps not be surprised that many care providers simply introduce a blanket “no lifting” rule, effectively depriving thousands of people of support; rather than undertaking a proper risk assessment. Origin of the double handed care myth?So to this new research, which identifies a possible source for the “two people for every lift” misconception, in the National Minimum Standards Regulations for Domiciliary Care 2003, which state:
Note the final third of that statement, when the need is identified from the manual handling risk assessment. What managers should take from this is that a moving and handling risk assessment is necessary, not that two carers should be involved in every lift. Transfer aids often designed for safe single-handed useAnother factor which is very often not taken into account, is the many developments in transfer aids in recent years: frequently, when I receive information about a new hoist or stand aid, somewhere in the description will be words to the effect that it has been designed for safe use by a single carer. As is so often the case, practice doesn’t always keep up with technology, and what might have been prudent with previous generations of products is just carried over without question. Today we have perhaps reached some sort of tipping point, where finances are so tightly squeezed, and demands on care providers so great, that attention really has to be given to any sort of waste: and insisting on double handed care in all circumstances, whether necessary or not, means that costs of care are higher than they need to be; many people may miss out on necessary support altogether; coordinating care visits is harder; and those on the receiving end have twice as many people invading their space as is really necessary. Research shows benefits of assessing whether or not two carers are neededThe research from the University of Salford makes a strong financial case for challenging the notion of double handed care for every lift. I would love to know what you think on this subject, whether you are a professional involved in moving and handling; an equipment supplier; a family carer; or client receiving care services. You can post your comments at the bottom of this page. Article ends – click to return to top or check out related resources belowFurther reading and resourcesYou can access information on a wide range of hoists and transfer aids in our Moving and Handling People area November 2019: Matthew Box and Linda Agnew, independent occupational therapists, have reviewed double-handed care packages in Thurrock, with positive results. FAQs on manual handling assessments return to top |