Why is Harry Potter a dynamic character?

Characters are, quite literally, the life of any story: they often drive the plot and progress the story. Well-written characters are one of the most important ingredients to any good story, and so it’s important to understand what makes a character well-written. 

One fundamental aspect of characterization that you need to know is the amount of change that a character undergoes for the entirety of the story. A character can be either dynamic or static. For this article, we’ll talk about dynamic characters and static characters, and how you can put well-written characters into your manuscript!

Dynamic Character: Definition

A dynamic character is a character that undergoes a significant internal change throughout the story. Dynamic characters exhibit a different personality, often contrasting with their original characteristics, at the end of the story. Of course, the internal change should be driven by the events in the story, and it could be for the better or for the worse.

Dynamic characters can be easily confused with round characters, and although there is some overlap, they are not exactly the same. Round characters are complex characters with good depth, and they do not have to change at the end of the story. However, well-written characters are often dynamic and round.

Writing a dynamic character can be challenging, but planning their development ahead of time can help a lot. LivingWriter sports the Story Elements, where you can keep notes about your dynamic characters and write down beforehand the starting and ending personalities of your characters. If you want to flesh out their character arc, Outlines and Chapters can help you organize your ideas of how you want to develop your characters before you start writing your piece.

Why is Harry Potter a dynamic character?
Keep notes about your characters and write down their personalities

Oftentimes, the main protagonist of your story is a dynamic character: over the course of the story, they undergo challenges, overcome trials, and end as a better version of what they were at the start. A great example of a dynamic protagonist is the eponymous Harry Potter of J.K. Rowling’s Harry Potter book series. Harry Potter started as a boy who was abused by his aunt’s family, and by the end of the series, he has become a brave boy who defeated the most evil wizard of his time.

Other Notable Dynamic Characters

  • Ebenezer Scrooge in Charles Dickens’ A Christmas Carol is an exemplary dynamic character, who starts out as a lonely old man who overworks his employees and ends as a better, more generous man.
  • Dumbo in Helen Aberson-Mayer and Harold Pearl’s Dumbo, the Flying Elephant overcomes his own fears and doubts and gains confidence to fly on his own without the aid of his “magic feather” at the end.

However, main characters do not always have to be dynamic. They can also be static instead.

What’s a Static Character?

A static character is a character that, unlike dynamic characters, does not undergo a significant change at the end of the story. Static characters remain largely the same through the story, and so for the most part, side characters are usually static ones. Antagonists are also usually static characters, but not always.

Despite the change that they never go through, having static characters is important for a story. Aside from having less pressure of creating an arc for their own characterization, static characters serve to support the progress of a dynamic main protagonist. Because they often don’t change, the changes to a major character are emphasized more when they stay near a static character. Similarly, static characters can also provide contrast to the story’s setting.

Static characters can be confused with flat characters, and just like with dynamic and round characters, there is a fundamental difference. Flat characters are one-dimensional characters, with very little complexity on their characterization. Although flat characters are often static, static characters can still be round characters. 

Although it’s good advice to heed that main protagonists should be dynamic, having a static main protagonist can also work. A great example is Sir Arthur Conan Doyle’s Sherlock Holmes, the world-renowned detective who has never undergone any major internal changes in any of the original stories. As long as the character is well-rounded, being static is not a problem; it may even add more to their charm instead.

Other Notable Static Characters

  • Scar in Don Ferguson’s The Lion King is a well-known static antagonist, remaining to be cunning and sly until his own demise at the end.
  • Cinderella in, well, Cinderella, is another example of a static protagonist, who, although she experienced a major external change, remained to be the same perfectly kind girl.

What Else is Different?

Dynamic characters, due to their nature of requiring an entire character arc to flesh out their internal changes, often have a larger role in the story, hence this is delegated to the main characters. Of course, this is a rule that can be broken: antagonists themselves can also be dynamic, such as Darth Vader, and protagonists can be static like Sherlock Holmes. 

Because the story spends time in developing a dynamic character, it also allows the readers to get invested in the character. A static character would have to be very well-rounded in order to keep the interest of the audience in the same way.

If They Didn’t Really Change…?

Some protagonists, such as Katniss Everdeen from the The Hunger Games trilogy, do not experience a major internal change, or at least not one that contrasts from their original personality. However, instead their original characteristics were strengthened by their journey throughout the story. These kinds of characters sit in the middling ground of dynamic and static characters. They’re also not bad characters, seeing the popularity of the trilogy. 

Wrapping It Up

Deciding whether a character changes at the end of the story is a major consideration to make; it can make or break not just the character, but also the story. LivingWriter can ease the planning phase of your manuscript with its rich features tailored specifically to help you, the writer, write more efficiently and finish that manuscript you’ve been working on.

Why is Harry Potter a dynamic character?

Date: April 27, 2012

Reading Goals for this month: One and a half books per month

Title: Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone

Author: J.K. Rowling

Genre: Adventure, Fantasy

Number of pages: 309

Readability: Easy

Date Started: February ?

Date Completed: February ?

Who are the main characters? Who are the minor characters? : The main characters are Harry Potter, Ron Weasley, and Hermione Granger. There three started off as strangers, but as time moved on, they became a group of friends. The main character who is the antagonist is Professor Quirrell. The minor characters include other friends of Harry, Ron, and Hermione such as Neville Longbottom and Hagrid. Harry’s enemies in school are Professor Snape and Draco Malfoy. Other minor characters include Harry’s cruel aunt, uncle, and cousin who he grew up with, because his parents were killed by Voldemort.

Describe their personality traits (both good and bad). : Harry is a brave and courageous boy who stands up for his friends. When Malfoy took a precious gift that Neville dropped, Harry yelled, “Give it here, or I’ll knock you off that broom!” Harry can be very curious, such as one time, he discovered mirror that showed him and his parents behind him even though they were not there, so he repeatedly visited the room where the mirror was. He that that so he could figure out what the mirror was actually showing him. “Harry thought. The he said slowly, ‘It shows us what we want… whatever we want…'” Ron is clumsy and not bright headed, and because of this, the spell he was trying did not work. “‘Sunshine, daisies, butter mellow, Turn this stupid fat rat yellow.’ He waved his want, but nothing happened.” Yet, Ron tries his best to be courageous, just like the time when he, Harry, and Hermione were playing a chess game that was life threatening. “‘That’s chess!’ snapped Ron. ‘You’ve got to make some sacrifices! I take one step forward and she’ll take me – that leaves you free to checkmate the king, Harry!'” Ron had risked himself in order for Harry to stop his enemy. Hermione is very intelligent and loyal. She does not like to break rules, and she does not like for her friends to break rules. She can get very stubborn. ” Hermione wasn’t going to give up that easily. She followed Ron through the portrait hole, hissing at them like an angry goose.”

Do you like or dislike the characters? Why? : I like Harry Potter, because of his brave and courageous personality. His curiosity is what makes the story interesting and adventurous, which is what I enjoy. However, I dislike Hermione, because she is a goody-two shoes and a show off, and these are two personalities that I despise. Her enthusiasm during her classes is what I find annoying. I also dislike Draco, because he is picks on the weak, and tries to start fights with everyone. This makes him an enemy of Harry.

If you could be any character in this story, who would you be? Why? : I would like to be Ron, because I would want to have a brother, or more. Ron has older twin brothers, and they are troublesome and incredibly hilarious. I wish to live in a crazy family like the Weasley’s, even if they are poor. However, the Weasley’s can not afford new school items, so Ron has to use hand-me-downs from his older siblings. I think the life of Ron is more exciting and intense.

Suppose you had a chance to meet one of the characters. What would you say to him or her? : If I got the chance to meet Hermione Granger, I would like to ask her questions about magic, since she is a genius. I would want to ask her questions about potions, plants, and creatures, since there is no real magic in the real world. Plus there is no one else I could ask it about to. Even if knowing that kind of information is useless in the real world, I think I will find it quite interesting and acknowledgeable. I would also ask her about how fast she can read books and how many she has read in her first year of Hogwarts.

What type of characters are they? : Harry is a dynamic character, because in the beginning he was calm and quiet. He did not know how to make friends, and he was always picked on in school by his cousin. As soon as Harry found out about magic and Hogwarts, he changed into a brave and loyal boy who could easily make friends, but there would always be side effects to the new Harry. He would have more enemies. Ron is also a dynamic character. He was at first a clumsy boy who was a bit of a scaredy-cat, but as soon as he met Harry, he gradually became courageous, and he sometimes stood up for his friends. Unlike the two boys, Hermione is a static character. Since the beginning of the story to the end, she has always been a girl who follows rules and is loyal to her friends by helping them out at any time.

Does a character in this story remind you of anyone else you have read about? : Harry Potter is a bit similar to the main character named Alex Rider in a book called Stormbreaker. Both characters are teenagers, and they are both brave. Alex is loyal to his friends and team just as Harry is loyal to his friends and house. The two have been raised by people other than their parents, because their parents died. The difference between the two is Harry is a wizard and Alex is a spy, but both of them were already born with the path to become who they are now.

What lesson was learned by the main character? How did that character change as a result of that lesson? : Harry was a calm, quiet boy who did not talk much. He had a miserable life living with his aunt’s family. On his 11th birthday, he learned that there is more to life. He had lived in his aunt’s house for all his life with her husband and greedy son, and he lived with torture and with no love and affection. As soon as Harry was brought out into the world of magic in Hogwarts, he realized that there was a better life waiting for him. When he made friends and comrades, he knew he was happy. He was happy, because he was a somebody. He was the Seeker in the Quidditch team, a pressured position that the whole team had to rely on to win.