Why is career plateau important?

Career plateau is defined as a point in the career path of a professional where the possibility of a vertical promotion is low and work type and quality become monotonous in nature. The position of the employee becomes stagnant with same and repetitive work and responsibilities. Because of the way organizations are shaped, the hierarchy of organizations reduce the possibility of employees to grow vertically after a point in time until there is a position opening up at the top and the skill level and feedback of the person matches for the same.

At every higher level of organizational hierarchy, the number of positions decrease. Hence upwards mobility becomes difficult with the positions not being open or with more people vying for the same position.

When the employees feel trapped and stuck in such situations, the Human Resource function of the organization is responsible to provide opportunities for lateral mobility to avoid a feeling of stagnation among employees. The current job has to be made more meaningful and engaging, and the employees have to be rewarded by alternate means in the absence of promotions.

Plateauing is an issue faced by individuals wherein they feel that their present is not progressive and their future is ambiguous. When their lives stabilize individuals can become very dissatisfied. Dissatisfied employees are a drawback to organizations and hence it is important to ensure employees do not plateau. This can be done by providing a variety of training and developing opportunities in specialized technical skills or general skills such as foreign language. Organizations also take up career planning initiatives where individual employees are given a personalized career growth plan. One major challenge with plateauing is that people may not be aware of the problem they are facing; hence it makes it difficult for the HR to address the issue.

Ways to move out the Career Plateau

Once an employee gets stuck in the career plateau, the following ways can help move out of it:

1. Reskill/Upskill

This is one of the best ways to break the monotonous work and move to a different and more relevant stream of work inside the organization or outside the organization as well. Learning about new fields and trends in the market in same or different job role can help in getting reskilled and get better roles which may help in long run.

2. Job Enlargement

An employee can discuss with the manager and the HR and can volunteer to take up additional responsibilities to not only help but also learn and become more relevant and critical in the organization.

This actually helps the person grow and also prepare for the future roles as well. The experience and skills acquired through this are more industry relevant and role specific.

3. Job Rotation

Sometimes moving from one department to another can open up new avenues and help a person come out the plateau. Also changing geography or role within same organization can do the same thing.

4. Job Switch

Sometimes if vertical growth and better work is not possible in the current organization, a person can move to a different organization which may provide a better role and structure than the current role

Example of Career Plateau

Let us say an employee John Smith is working in sales department of a heavy engineering company since 14 years. Since the time he joined, he was promoted well and performed at a good level for first 8-9 years. Since last 5 years, John has not been able to get promotion and is working in the same role and has the same responsibilities and KPIs. John is feeling stagnant in the career because of this. As per the understanding of the concept, John is at the point which can be defined as career plateau.

To correct this, John started training in the marketing field and upskilled himself with industry relevant certifications in marketing and heavy engineering field. Once he got upskilled, he tried taking more tasks from the marketing team and eventually moved into the marketing department at a better role because of his 14 years experience and relevant skillset.

Hence, this concludes the definition of Career Plateau along with its overview.

This article has been researched & authored by the Business Concepts Team. It has been reviewed & published by the MBA Skool Team. The content on MBA Skool has been created for educational & academic purpose only.

Browse the definition and meaning of more similar terms. The Management Dictionary covers over 2000 business concepts from 5 categories.

Continue Reading:

« Career Planning Career Stages »



Share this Page on:

1. Tomasko R.M. Restructuring: Getting it right. Manag. Rev. 1992;81:10–15. [Google Scholar]

2. Clark J., Koonce R. Engaging organizational survivors. Train. Dev. 1995;49:22–31. [Google Scholar]

3. Ference T.P., Stoner J.A.F., Warren E.K. Managing the career plateau. Acad. Manag. Rev. 1977;2:602–612. doi: 10.2307/257512. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

4. Tremblay M., Roger A., Toulouse J.-M. Career plateau and work attitudes: An empirical study of managers. Hum. Relat. 1995;48:221–238. doi: 10.1177/001872679504800301. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

5. Yang W.N., Niven K., Johnson S. Career plateau: A review of 40 years of research. J. Vocat. Behav. 2019;110:286–302. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2018.11.005. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

6. Evans M.G., Gilbert E. Plateaued managers: Their need gratifications and their effort-performance expectations [I] J. Manag. Stud. 1984;21:99–108. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.1984.tb00226.x. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

7. Festinger L. A theory of social comparison processes. Hum. Relat. 1954;7:117–140. doi: 10.1177/001872675400700202. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

8. Maslach C., Schaufeli W.B., Leiter M.P. Job burnout. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2001;52:397–422. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.397. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

9. Pillai K.G., Nair S.R. The effect of social comparison orientation on luxury purchase intentions. J. Bus. Res. 2021;134:89–100. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.05.033. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

10. Zhang X., Wu W., Wu W., Zhang Y., Xia Y. Are your gains threat or chance for me? A social comparison perspective on idiosyncratic deals and coworkers' acceptance. J. Manag. Organ. 2020:1–22. doi: 10.1017/jmo.2020.32. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

11. Higgins E.T. Promotion and prevention: Regulatory focus as a motivational principle. In: Zanna M.P., editor. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. Volume 30. Academic Press; San Diego, CA, USA: 1998. pp. 1–46. [Google Scholar]

12. Higgins E.T., Pinelli F. Regulatory focus and fit effects in organizations. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav. 2020;7:25–48. doi: 10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012119-045404. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

13. Higgins E.T., Idson L.C., Freitas A.L., Spiegel S., Molden D.C. Transfer of value from fit. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 2003;84:1140–1153. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.84.6.1140. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

14. Liu C.-E., Hu C., Xie W., Liu T., He W. The moderated-mediation effect of workplace anxiety and regulatory focus in the relationship between work-related identity discrepancy and employee innovation. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2020;17:6121. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17176121. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

15. Greenhaus J.H., Parasuraman S., Wormley W.M. Effects of race on organizational experiences, job performance evaluations, and career outcomes. Acad. Manag. J. 1990;33:64–86. [Google Scholar]

16. Hall D.T. Project work as an antidote to career plateauing in a declining engineering organization. Hum. Resour. Manag. 1985;24:271–292. doi: 10.1002/hrm.3930240304. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

17. Jiang Z., Newman A., Le H., Presbitero A., Zheng C. Career exploration: A review and future research agenda. J. Vocat. Behav. 2019;110:338–356. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2018.08.008. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

18. McLagan P.A. Models for HRD practice. Train. Dev. J. 1989;43:49–60. [Google Scholar]

19. Lin Y.C., Chen A.S.Y. Experiencing career plateau on a committed career journey: A boundary condition of career stages. Pers. Rev. 2020;50:1797–1819. doi: 10.1108/PR-03-2020-0192. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

20. Savickas M.L. Career construction: A developmental theory of vocational behavior. In: Brown D., editor. Career Choice and Development. 4th ed. John Wiley & Sons; San Francisco, CA, USA: 2002. pp. 149–205. [Google Scholar]

21. Savickas M.L. The theory and practice of career construction. In: Lent R.W., Brown S.D., editors. Career Development and Counseling: Putting Theory and Research to Work. 1st ed. John Wiley & Sons; Hoboken, NJ, USA: 2005. pp. 42–70. [Google Scholar]

22. Wang B., Liu Y., Qian J., Parker S.K. Achieving effective remote working during the COVID-19 pandemic: A work design perspective. Appl. Psychol. 2021;70:16–59. doi: 10.1111/apps.12290. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

23. Veiga J.F. Plateaued versus nonplateaued managers: Career patterns, attitudes, and path potential. Acad. Manag. J. 1981;24:566–578. [Google Scholar]

24. Near J.P. A discriminant analysis of plateaued versus nonplateaued managers. J. Vocat. Behav. 1985;26:177–188. doi: 10.1016/0001-8791(85)90017-X. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

25. Chao G.T. Exploration of the conceptualization and measurement of career plateau: A comparative analysis. J. Manag. 1990;16:181–193. doi: 10.1177/014920639001600113. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

26. Ettington D.R. Successful career plateauing. J. Vocat. Behav. 1998;52:72–88. doi: 10.1006/jvbe.1997.1584. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

27. Rotondo D.M., Perrewé P.L. Coping with a career plateau: An empirical examination of what works and what doesn't. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 2000;30:2622–2646. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2000.tb02453.x. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

28. Allen T.D., Russell J.E., Poteet M.L., Dobbins G.H. Learning and development factors related to perceptions of job content and hierarchical plateauing. J. Organ. Behav. 1999;20:1113–1137. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199912)20:7<1113::AID-JOB944>3.0.CO;2-7. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

29. Bardwick J.M. The Plateauing Trap. American Management Association; New York, NY, USA: 1986. [Google Scholar]

30. Shabeer S., Mohammed S.J., Jawahar I.M., Bilal A.R. The mediating influence of fit perceptions in the relationship between career adaptability and job content and hierarchical plateaus. J. Career Dev. 2019;46:332–345. doi: 10.1177/0894845318763960. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

31. Yang W.N., Johnson S., Niven K. “That's not what I signed up for!” A longitudinal investigation of the impact of unmet expectation and age in the relation between career plateau and job attitudes. J. Vocat. Behav. 2018;107:71–85. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2018.03.006. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

32. Godshalk V.M., Fender C.M. External and internal reasons for career plateauing: Relationships with work outcomes. Group Organ. Manag. 2015;40:529–559. doi: 10.1177/1059601114558062. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

33. Feldman D.C., Weitz B.A. Career plateaus reconsidered. J. Manag. 1988;14:69–80. doi: 10.1177/014920638801400107. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

34. Hofstetter H., Cohen A. The mediating role of job content plateau on the relationship between work experience characteristics and early retirement and turnover intentions. Pers. Rev. 2014;43:350–376. doi: 10.1108/PR-03-2012-0054. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

35. Hurst C.S., Baranik L.E., Clark S. Job Content Plateaus: Justice, Job Satisfaction, and Citizenship Behavior. J. Career Dev. 2017;44:283–296. doi: 10.1177/0894845316652250. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

36. Tremblay M. Understanding the dynamic relationship between career plateauing, organizational affective commitment and citizenship behavior. J. Vocat. Behav. 2021;129:103611. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2021.103611. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

37. Lin Y.C., Chen A.S.Y., Lai Y.T. Breach or bridge your career? Understanding the relationship between career plateau and internal employability. Pers. Rev. 2018;47:991–1007. doi: 10.1108/PR-04-2017-0101. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

38. Drucker-Godard C., Fouque T., Gollety M., Le Flanchec A. Career plateauing, job satisfaction and commitment of scholars in French universities. Public Organ. Rev. 2015;15:335–351. doi: 10.1007/s11115-014-0280-0. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

39. Nachbagauer A.G.M., Riedl G. Effects of concepts of career plateaus on performance, work satisfaction and commitment. Int. J. Manpow. 2002;23:716–733. doi: 10.1108/01437720210453920. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

40. Freudenberger H.J. Staff burn-out. J. Soc. Issues. 1974;30:159–165. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1974.tb00706.x. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

41. Maslach C., Jackson S.E. The measurement of experienced burnout. J. Organ. Behav. 1981;2:99–113. doi: 10.1002/job.4030020205. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

42. Schaufeli W.B., Bakker A.B., van Rhenen W. How changes in job demands and resources predict burnout, work engagement, and sickness absenteeism. J. Organ. Behav. 2009;30:893–917. doi: 10.1002/job.595. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

43. Woranetipo S., Chavanovanich J. Three-way interactions of workload, social support and coping strategy on job burnout. J. Behav. Sci. 2021;16:58–72. [Google Scholar]

44. Jang S., Allen T.D., Regina J. Office housework, burnout, and promotion: Does gender matter? J. Bus. Psychol. 2020;36:793–805. doi: 10.1007/s10869-020-09703-6. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

45. Alessandri G., Perinelli E., De Longis E., Schaufeli W.B., Theodorou A., Borgogni L., Caprara G.V., Cinque L. Job burnout: The contribution of emotional stability and emotional self-efficacy beliefs. J. Occup. Organ. Psychol. 2018;91:823–851. doi: 10.1111/joop.12225. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

46. Lan X., Liang Y., Wu G., Ye H. Relationships among job burnout, generativity concern, and subjective well-being: A moderated mediation model. Front. Psychol. 2021;12:613767. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.613767. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

47. Wang L., Wang H., Shao S., Jia G., Xiang J. Job burnout on subjective well-being among Chinese female doctors: The moderating role of perceived social support. Front. Psychol. 2020;11:435. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00435. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

48. Zeng X., Zhang X., Chen M., Liu J., Wu C. The influence of perceived organizational support on police job burnout: A moderated mediation Model. Front. Psychol. 2020;11:948. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00948. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

49. Wen B., Zhou X., Hu Y., Zhang X. Role stress and turnover intention of front-line hotel employees: The roles of burnout and service climate. Front. Psychol. 2020;11:36. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00036. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

50. Trifiletti E., Pedrazza M., Berlanda S., Pyszczynski T. Burnout disrupts anxiety buffer functioning among nurses: A three-way interaction model. Front. Psychol. 2017;8:1362. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01362. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

51. Cauberghe V., Van Wesenbeeck I., De Jans S., Hudders L., Ponnet K. How adolescents use social media to cope with feelings of loneliness and anxiety during COVID-19 lockdown. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw. 2021;24:250–257. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2020.0478. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

52. Liu Y., Lu L., Wang W.X., Liu S., Chen H.R., Gao X., Huang M.Y., Liu Y.N., Ren Y.M., Wang C.C. Job burnout and occupational stressors among Chinese healthcare professionals at county-level health alliances. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2020;17:1848. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17061848. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

53. Peng J., Cao F., Zhang Y., Cao Y., Zhang Y., Zhu X., Miao D. Reflections on motivation: How regulatory focus influences self-framing and risky decision making. Curr. Psychol. 2021;40:2927–2937. doi: 10.1007/s12144-019-00217-w. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

54. Koopmann J., Johnson R.E., Wang M., Lanaj K., Wang G., Shi J. A self-regulation perspective on how and when regulatory focus differentially relates to citizenship behaviors. J. Appl. Psychol. 2019;104:629–641. doi: 10.1037/apl0000366. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

55. Higgins E.T. Regulatory focus theory. In: Scott R.A., Kosslyn S.M., editors. Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences. John Wiley & Sons; Hoboken, NJ, USA: 2015. pp. 483–504. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

56. Bozer G., Delegach M. Bringing context to workplace coaching: A theoretical framework based on uncertainty avoidance and regulatory Focus. Hum. Resour. Dev. Rev. 2019;18:376–402. doi: 10.1177/1534484319853098. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

57. Wang X., Wang J. Information matching: How regulatory focus affects information preference and information choice. Front. Psychol. 2021;12:618537. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.618537. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

58. Zhang Y., Zhang Y., Ng T.W.H., Lam S.S.K. Promotion- and prevention-focused coping: A meta- analytic examination of regulatory strategies in the work stress process. J. Appl. Psychol. 2019;104:1296–1323. doi: 10.1037/apl0000404. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

59. Hofstetter H., Rosenblatt Z. Predicting protean and physical boundaryless career attitudes by work importance and work alternatives: Regulatory focus mediation effects. Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 2017;28:2136–2158. doi: 10.1080/09585192.2015.1128465. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

60. Shah J., Higgins T., Friedman R.S. Performance incentives and means: How regulatory focus influences goal attainment. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 1998;74:285–293. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.74.2.285. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

61. Higgins E.T. How self-regulation creates distinct values: The case of promotion and prevention decision making. J. Consum. Psychol. 2002;12:177–191. doi: 10.1207/S15327663JCP1203_01. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

62. Higgins E.T. Beyond pleasure and pain. Am. Psychol. 1997;52:1280–1300. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.52.12.1280. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

63. Milshtein S. Person-environment fit (P-E fit) in values and regulatory focus and its relationship to stress, burnout and meaning among high-tech workers in economically stable versus unstable environments. In: Malach-Pines A., Özbilgin M.F., editors. Handbook of Research on High-Technology Entrepreneurs. Edward Elgar Publishing; Northampton, MA, USA: 2010. pp. 219–230. [Google Scholar]

64. Liang H.L., Kao Y.T., Lin C.C. Moderating effect of regulatory focus on burnout and exercise behavior. Percept. Mot. Ski. 2013;117:696–708. doi: 10.2466/06.29.PMS.117x29z0. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

65. Dai Y.D., Altinay L., Zhuang W.L., Chen K.T. Work engagement and job burnout? Roles of regulatory foci, supervisors’ organizational embodiment and psychological ownership. J. Hosp. Tour. Manag. 2021;46:114–122. doi: 10.1016/j.jhtm.2020.12.001. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

66. Dai Y.D., Zhuang W.L., Lu S.C., Huan T.C. Work engagement or job burnout? Psychological ownership amongst the employees of international tourist hotels. Tour. Rev. 2020;76:1243–1259. doi: 10.1108/TR-03-2020-0087. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

67. Adams K.E., Tyler J.M. Regulatory focus and social reconnection following social exclusion. J. Soc. Psychol. 2021;161:331–336. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2020.1839004. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

68. Hackman J.R., Oldham G.R. Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organ. Behav. Hum. Perform. 1976;16:250–279. doi: 10.1016/0030-5073(76)90016-7. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

69. Milliman J.F. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Southern California; Los Angeles, CA, USA: 1992. Causes, Consequences, and Moderating Factors of Career Plateauing. [Google Scholar]

70. Schaufeli W.B., Bakker A.B. Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi-sample study. J. Organ. Behav. 2004;25:293–315. doi: 10.1002/job.248. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

71. Lockwood P., Jordan C.H., Kunda Z. Motivation by positive or negative role models: Regulatory focus determines who will best inspire us. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 2002;83:854–864. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.83.4.854. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

72. Hair J.F., Black W.C., Babin B.J., Anderson R.E. Multivariate Data Analysis. 7th ed. Prentice Hall; Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA: 2010. [Google Scholar]

73. Bagozzi R.P., Yi Y. On the evaluation of structural equation models. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 1988;16:74–94. doi: 10.1007/BF02723327. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

74. Fornell C., Larcker D.F. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Mark. Res. 1981;18:39–50. doi: 10.1177/002224378101800104. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

75. Armstrong J.S., Overton T.S. Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys. J. Mark. Res. 1977;14:396–402. doi: 10.1177/002224377701400320. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

76. Woo H.R. Exploratory Study Examining the Joint Impacts of Mentoring and Managerial Coaching on Organizational Commitment. Sustainability. 2017;9:181. doi: 10.3390/su9020181. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

77. Harman H.H. Modern Factor Analysis. University of Chicago; Chicago, IL, USA: 1967. [Google Scholar]

78. Podsakoff P.M., Organ D.W. Self-reports in organization research: Problems and prospects. J. Manag. 1986;12:531–544. [Google Scholar]

79. Aiken L.S., West S.G. Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Sage; Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: 1991. [Google Scholar]

Última postagem

Tag