Which of the following is a positive way that teams deal with situational surprises or unexpected changes within their task assignments?

  1. Ackerman MS (2000) The intellectual challenge of CSCW: the gap between social requirements and technical feasibility. Hum Comput Interact 15(2–3):179–203

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ågerfalk PJ, Fitzgerald B, Holmstrom Olsson H, Lings B, Lundell B, Ó Conchúir E (2005) A framework for considering opportunities and threats in distributed software development. In: Proceedings of the of DiSD’05. Austrian Computer Society, pp 47–61

  3. Alder GS, Noel TW, Ambrose ML (2006) Clarifying the effects of internet monitoring on job attitudes: the mediating role of employee trust. Inf Manag 43(7):894–903

    Google Scholar 

  4. Allen TJ (1984) Managing the flow of technology: technology transfer and the dissemination of technological information within the R&D organization. MIT Press Books 1, London

    Google Scholar 

  5. Alsharo M, Gregg D, Ramirez R (2017) Virtual team effectiveness: the role of knowledge sharing and trust. Inf Manag 54(4):479–490

    Google Scholar 

  6. Apple Inc (2017) Use FaceTime with your iPhone, iPad, or iPod touch. https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT204380

  7. Ardissono L, Bosio G (2012) Context-dependent awareness support in open collaboration environments. UMUAI 22(3):223–254

    Google Scholar 

  8. Armstrong DJ, Cole P (1995) Managing distances and differences in geographically distributed work groups. In: Jackson SE, Ruderman MN (eds) Diversity in work teams: research paradigms for a changing workplace. American Psychological Association, pp 187–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/10189-007

  9. Barczak G, Lassk F, Mulki J (2010) Antecedents of team creativity: an examination of team emotional intelligence, team trust and collaborative culture. Creat Innov Manag 19(4):332–345

    Google Scholar 

  10. Batarseh FS, Usher JM, Daspit JJ (2017) Collaboration capability in virtual teams: examining the influence on diversity and innovation. Int J Innov Manag 21(04):1750034

    Google Scholar 

  11. Battin RD, Crocker R, Kreidler J, Subramanian K (2001) Leveraging resources in global software development. IEEE Softw 18(2):70–77

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bell BS, Kozlowski W (2002) Goal orientation and ability: interactive effects on self-efficacy, performance, and knowledge. J Appl Psychol 87(3):497

    Google Scholar 

  13. Berry GR (2011) Enhancing effectiveness on virtual teams: understanding why traditional team skills are insufficient. J Bus Commun (1973) 48(2):186–206

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bjørn P, Ngwenyama O (2009) Virtual team collaboration: building shared meaning, resolving breakdowns and creating translucence. Inf Syst J 19(3):227–253

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bjørn P, Esbensen M, Jensen RE, Matthiesen S (2014) Does distance still matter? Revisiting the CSCW fundamentals on distributed collaboration. TOCHI 21(5):27

    Google Scholar 

  16. Blaskovich JL (2008) Exploring the effect of distance: an experimental investigation of virtual collaboration, social loafing, and group decisions. J Inf Syst 22(1):27–46

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bly SA, Harrison SR, Irwin S (1993) Media spaces: bringing people together in a video, audio, and computing environment. Commun ACM 36(1):28–46

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bodemer D, Dehler J (2011) Group awareness in CSCL environments. Comput Hum Behav 27(3):1043–1045

    Google Scholar 

  19. Boland D, Fitzgerald B (2004) Transitioning from a co-located to a globally-distributed software development team: a case study at Analog Devices Inc. In: Proceedings of the international workshop on global software development at ICSE’04. IET, pp 4–7

  20. Bos N, Olson J, Gergle D, Olson G, Wright Z (2002) Effects of four computer—mediated communications channels on trust development. In: Proceedings the of CHI’02. ACM, New York, pp 135–140

  21. Bradner E, Mark G (2002) Why distance matters: effects on cooperation, persuasion and deception. In: Proceedings of CSCW’02. ACM, New York, CSCW’02, pp 226–235

  22. Brannen MY, Salk JE (2000) Partnering across borders: negotiating organizational culture in a German–Japanese joint venture. Hum Relat 53(4):451–487

    Google Scholar 

  23. Breuer C, Hüffmeier J, Hertel G (2016) Does trust matter more in virtual teams? A meta-analysis of trust and team effectiveness considering virtuality and documentation as moderators. J Appl Psychol 101(8):1151

    Google Scholar 

  24. Brewer MB (1979) In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: a cognitive-motivational analysis. Psychol Bull 86(2):307

    Google Scholar 

  25. Buder J (2011) Group awareness tools for learning: current and future directions. Comput Hum Behav 27(3):1114–1117

    Google Scholar 

  26. Budgen D, Burn AJ, Brereton OP, Kitchenham BA, Pretorius R (2011) Empirical evidence about the UML: a systematic literature review. Softw Pract Exp 41(4):363–392

    Google Scholar 

  27. Burke K, Aytes K, Chidambaram L, Johnson JJ (1999) A study of partially distributed work groups: the impact of media, location, and time on perceptions and performance. Small Group Res 30(4):453–490

    Google Scholar 

  28. Buvik MP, Tvedt SD (2017) The influence of project commitment and team commitment on the relationship between trust and knowledge sharing in project teams. Proj Manag J 48(2):5–21

    Google Scholar 

  29. Calefato F, Lanubile F (2017) Establishing personal trust-based connections in distributed teams. Internet Technol Lett 1:e6

    Google Scholar 

  30. Calefato F, Lanubile F, Novielli N (2017) A preliminary analysis on the effects of propensity to trust in distributed software development. In: Proceedings of ICGSE’17. IEEE, New York, pp 56–60

  31. Carmel E, Agarwal R (2001) Tactical approaches for alleviating distance in global software development. IEEE Softw 18(2):22–29

    Google Scholar 

  32. Carte T, Chidambaram L (2004) A capabilities-based theory of technology deployment in diverse teams: leapfrogging the pitfalls of diversity and leveraging its potential with collaborative technology. J Assoc Inf Syst 5(11):4

    Google Scholar 

  33. Casey V, Richardson I (2004) Practical experience of virtual team software development. https://ulir.ul.ie/bitstream/handle/10344/2149/2004_Casey.pdf?sequence=2

  34. Chae SW (2016) Perceived proximity and trust network on creative performance in virtual collaboration environment. Proc Comput Sci 91(Itqm):807–812

    Google Scholar 

  35. Charlier SD, Stewart GL, Greco LM, Reeves CJ (2016) Emergent leadership in virtual teams: a multilevel investigation of individual communication and team dispersion antecedents. Leadersh Q 27(5):745–764

    Google Scholar 

  36. Cheng X, Fu S, Druckenmiller D (2016) Trust development in globally distributed collaboration: a case of us and chinese mixed teams. J Manag Inf Syst 33(4):978–1007

    Google Scholar 

  37. Cheng X, Fu S, Sun J, Han Y, Shen J, Zarifis A (2016) Investigating individual trust in semi-virtual collaboration of multicultural and unicultural teams. Comput Hum Behav 62:267–276

    Google Scholar 

  38. Cheng X, Yin G, Azadegan A, Kolfschoten G (2016) Trust evolvement in hybrid team collaboration: a longitudinal case study. Group Decis Negot 25(2):267–288

    Google Scholar 

  39. Chidambaram L, Tung LL (2005) Is out of sight, out of mind? An empirical study of social loafing in technology-supported groups. Inf Syst Res 16(2):149–168

    Google Scholar 

  40. Chinowsky PS, Taylor JE (2011) Distance matters: a social network analysis of geographic dispersion in engineering organizations. In: Proceedings of EPOC’11

  41. Cho J (2006) The mechanism of trust and distrust formation and their relational outcomes. J Retail 82(1):25–35

    Google Scholar 

  42. Choi OK, Cho E (2019) The mechanism of trust affecting collaboration in virtual teams and the moderating roles of the culture of autonomy and task complexity. Comput Hum Behav 91:305–315

    Google Scholar 

  43. Clark HH, Brennan SE (1991) Grounding in communication. In: Perspectives on socially shared cognition. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, pp 127–149

  44. Colquitt JA, Scott BA, LePine JA (2007) Trust, trustworthiness, and trust propensity: a meta-analytic test of their unique relationships with risk taking and job performance. J Appl Psychol 92(4):909

    Google Scholar 

  45. Cooper CD, Kurland NB (2002) Telecommuting, professional isolation, and employee development in public and private organizations. J Organ Behav 23(4):511–532

    Google Scholar 

  46. Cramton CD (2001) The mutual knowledge problem and its consequences for dispersed collaboration. Organ Sci 12(3):346–371

    Google Scholar 

  47. Cramton CD, Hinds PJ (2004) Subgroup dynamics in internationally distributed teams: ethnocentrism or cross-national learning? Res Organ Behav 26:231–263

    Google Scholar 

  48. Crisp CB, Jarvenpaa SL (2013) Swift trust in global virtual teams: trusting beliefs and normative actions. J Pers Psychol 12(1):45

    Google Scholar 

  49. Cummings JN (2011) Geography is alive and well in virtual teams. Commun ACM 54(8):24–26

    Google Scholar 

  50. Cummings JN, Kiesler S (2005) Collaborative research across disciplinary and organizational boundaries. Soc Stud Sci 35(5):703–722

    Google Scholar 

  51. Cummings JN, Kiesler S (2007) Coordination costs and project outcomes in multi-university collaborations. RP 36(10):1620–1634

    Google Scholar 

  52. Cummings JN, Kiesler S (2008) Who collaborates successfully? Prior experience reduces collaboration barriers in distributed interdisciplinary research. In: Proceedings of CSCW’08. ACM, New York, pp 437–446

  53. Cummings L, Bromiley P (1996) The organizational trust inventory (OTI): development and validation. In: Kramer RM, Tyler TR (eds) Trust in organizations: frontiers of theory and research. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp 302–330

    Google Scholar 

  54. Cundill G, Harvey B, Tebboth M, Cochrane L, Currie-Alder B, Vincent K, Lawn J, Nicholls RJ, Scodanibbio L, Prakash A et al (2019) Large-scale transdisciplinary collaboration for adaptation research: challenges and insights. Glob Chall 3(4):1700132

    Google Scholar 

  55. Curtis B, Krasner H, Iscoe N (1988) A field study of the software design process for large systems. Commun ACM 31(11):1268–1287

    Google Scholar 

  56. Dahlin KB, Weingart LR, Hinds PJ (2005) Team diversity and information use. Acad Manag J 48(6):1107–1123

    Google Scholar 

  57. Damian DE, Zowghi D (2002) The impact of stakeholders’ geographical distribution on managing requirements in a multi-site organization. In: Proceedings of RE’02. IEEE, New York, pp 319–328

  58. Darics E (2014) The blurring boundaries between synchronicity and asynchronicity: new communicative situations in work-related instant messaging. Int J Bus Commun 51(4):337–358

    Google Scholar 

  59. De Jong BA, Dirks KT, Gillespie N (2016) Trust and team performance: a meta-analysis of main effects, moderators, and covariates. J Appl Psychol 101(8):1134

    Google Scholar 

  60. Dennis AR, Fuller RM, Valacich JS (2008) Media, tasks, and communication processes: a theory of media synchronicity. MIS Q 32(3):575–600

    Google Scholar 

  61. Desanctis G, Monge P (1999) Introduction to the special issue: communication processes for virtual organizations. Organ Sci 10(6):693–703

    Google Scholar 

  62. Dourish P, Bellotti V (1992) Awareness and coordination in shared workspaces. In: Proceedings of CSCW’92. ACM, New York, pp 107–114

  63. Duarte DL, Snyder NT (2006) Mastering virtual teams: strategies, tools, and techniques that succeed. Wiley, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  64. Dubé L, Robey D (2009) Surviving the paradoxes of virtual teamwork. ISJ 19(1):3–30

    Google Scholar 

  65. Dvir T, Eden D, Avolio BJ, Shamir B (2002) Impact of transformational leadership on follower development and performance: a field experiment. Acad Manag J 45(4):735–744

    Google Scholar 

  66. Edwards HK, Sridhar V (2005) Analysis of software requirements engineering exercises in a global virtual team setup. J Glob Inf Manag (JGIM) 13(2):21–41

    Google Scholar 

  67. Eisenberg J, Krishnan A (2018) Addressing virtual work challenges: learning from the field. Organ Manag J 15(2):78–94

    Google Scholar 

  68. Eisenberg J, Mattarelli E (2017) Building bridges in global virtual teams: the role of multicultural brokers in overcoming the negative effects of identity threats on knowledge sharing across subgroups. J Int Manag 23(4):399–411

    Google Scholar 

  69. Eisenberg J, Post C, DiTomaso N (2019) Team dispersion and performance: the role of team communication and transformational leadership. Small Group Res 50(3):348–380

    Google Scholar 

  70. Elron E (1997) Top management teams within multinational corporations: effects of cultural heterogeneity. Leadersh Q 8(4):393–412

    Google Scholar 

  71. Erickson T, Smith DN, Kellogg WA, Laff M, Richards JT, Bradner E (1999) Socially translucent systems: social proxies, persistent conversation, and the design of “babble”. In: Proceedings of CHI’99. ACM, New York, pp 72–79

  72. Esbensen M, Bjørn P (2014) Routine and standardization in global software development. In: Proceedings of GROUP’14. ACM, New York, pp 12–23

  73. Espinosa JA, Carmel E (2004) The effect of time separation on coordination costs in global software teams: a dyad model. In: Proceedings of HICSS’04. IEEE, New York, p 10

  74. Espinosa JA, Pickering C (2006) The effect of time separation on coordination processes and outcomes: a case study. In: Proceedings of HICSS’06, vol 1. IEEE, New York, pp 25b–25b

  75. Espinosa JA, Cummings JN, Pickering C (2011) Time separation, coordination, and performance in technical teams. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 59(1):91–103

    Google Scholar 

  76. Ferrell JZ, Herb KC (2012) Improving communication in virtual teams, pp 1–7. https://www.siop.org/Research-Publications/SIOP-White-Papers

  77. Finholt T, Sproull L, Kiesler S (1990) Communication and performance in ad hoc task groups. In: Galegher J, Kraut RE (eds) Intellectual teamwork: social and technological foundations of cooperative work. Psychology Press, New York, pp 291–325

    Google Scholar 

  78. Finholt TA, Olson GM (1997) From laboratories to collaboratories: a new organizational form for scientific collaboration. Psychol Sci 8(1):28–36

    Google Scholar 

  79. Fjermestad J (2004) An analysis of communication mode in group support systems research. Decis Support Syst 37(2):239–263

    Google Scholar 

  80. Gajendran RS, Harrison DA, Delaney-Klinger K (2015) Are telecommuters remotely good citizens? Unpacking telecommuting’s effects on performance via i-deals and job resources. Pers Psychol 68(2):353–393

    Google Scholar 

  81. Gaver WW, Sellen A, Heath C, Luff P (1993) One is not enough: multiple views in a media space. In: Proceedings of INTERACT’93 and CHI’93. ACM, New York, pp 335–341

  82. Gibbs JL, Kim H, Boyraz M (2017) Virtual teams. In: The international encyclopedia of organizational communication, pp 1–14. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Jennifer_Gibbs/publication/314712225_Virtual_Teams/links/5a3d942a0f7e9ba8688e91f6/Virtual-Teams.pdf

  83. Gibson CB, Gibbs JL (2006) Unpacking the concept of virtuality: the effects of geographic dispersion, electronic dependence, dynamic structure, and national diversity on team innovation. Adm Sci Q 51(3):451–495

    Google Scholar 

  84. Gibson CB, McDaniel DM (2010) Moving beyond conventional wisdom: advancements in cross-cultural theories of leadership, conflict, and teams. Perspect Psychol Sci 5(4):450–462

    Google Scholar 

  85. Gibson CB, Gibbs JL, Stanko TL, Tesluk P, Cohen SG (2011) Including the “i” in virtuality and modern job design: extending the job characteristics model to include the moderating effect of individual experiences of electronic dependence and copresence. Organ Sci 22(6):1481–1499

    Google Scholar 

  86. Gibson CB, Huang L, Kirkman BL, Shapiro DL (2014) Where global and virtual meet: the value of examining the intersection of these elements in twenty-first-century teams. Annu Rev Organ Psychol Organ Behav 1(1):217–244

    Google Scholar 

  87. Gilbert D, Tsao J (2000) Exploring Chinese cultural influences and hospitality marketing relationships. Int J Contemp Hosp Manag 12:45–54

    Google Scholar 

  88. Gilson LL, Maynard MT, Jones Young NC, Vartiainen M, Hakonen M (2015) Virtual teams research: 10 years, 10 themes, and 10 opportunities. J Manag 41(5):1313–1337

    Google Scholar 

  89. Glikson E, Wolley AW, Gupta P, Kim YJ (2019) Visualized automatic feedback in virtual teams. Front Psychol 10:814

    Google Scholar 

  90. Google Inc (2017) Google Hangouts. https://hangouts.google.com/

  91. Greenhalgh T, Peacock R (2005) Effectiveness and efficiency of search methods in systematic reviews of complex evidence: audit of primary sources. BMJ 331(7524):1064–1065

    Google Scholar 

  92. Gressgård LJ (2011) Virtual team collaboration and innovation in organizations. Team Perform Manag Int J. https://doi.org/10.1108/dlo.2011.08125daa.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Grinter RE (2003) Recomposition: coordinating a web of software dependencies. J CSCW 12(3):297–327

    Google Scholar 

  94. Gudykunst WB (1997) Cultural variability in communication: an introduction. Commun Res 24(4):327–348

    Google Scholar 

  95. Hall ET (1976) Beyond culture. Anchor, Garden City

    Google Scholar 

  96. Han SJ, Chae C, Macko P, Park W, Beyerlein M (2017) How virtual team leaders cope with creativity challenges. Eur J Train Dev. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJTD-10-2016-0073

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. Handley SM, Benton W (2013) The influence of task-and location-specific complexity on the control and coordination costs in global outsourcing relationships. JOM 31(3):109–128

    Google Scholar 

  98. Hardin AM, Fuller MA, Davison RM (2007) I know i can, but can we? Culture and efficacy beliefs in global virtual teams. Small Group Res 38(1):130–155

    Google Scholar 

  99. Harrison DA, Price KH, Gavin JH, Florey AT (2002) Time, teams, and task performance: changing effects of surface-and deep-level diversity on group functioning. Acad Manag J 45(5):1029–1045

    Google Scholar 

  100. Harrison DA, Price KH, Gavin JH, Florey AT (2002) Time, teams, and task performance: changing effects of surface-and deep-level diversity on group functioning. AMJ 45(5):1029–1045

    Google Scholar 

  101. Herbsleb JD, Grinter RE (1999) Splitting the organization and integrating the code: Conway’s law revisited. In: Proceedings of ICSE’99. IEEE, New York, pp 85–95

  102. Herbsleb JD, Mockus A (2003) An empirical study of speed and communication in globally distributed software development. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 29(6):481–494

    Google Scholar 

  103. Herbsleb JD, Mockus A, Finholt TA, Grinter RE (2000) Distance, dependencies, and delay in a global collaboration. In: Proceedings of CSCW’00. ACM, New York, pp 319–328

  104. Hertzum M, Pries-Heje J (2011) Is minimizing interaction a solution to cultural and maturity inequality in offshore outsourcing? In: Balancing sourcing and innovation in information systems development, pp 77–97

  105. Hill NS, Bartol KM (2016) Empowering leadership and effective collaboration in geographically dispersed teams. Pers Psychol 69(1):159–198

    Google Scholar 

  106. Hinds P, Kiesler S (2002) Distributed work. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  107. Hinds PJ, Bailey DE (2003) Out of sight, out of sync: understanding conflict in distributed teams. Organ Sci 14(6):615–632

    Google Scholar 

  108. Hinds PJ, Mortensen M (2005) Understanding conflict in geographically distributed teams: the moderating effects of shared identity, shared context, and spontaneous communication. Organ Sci 16(3):290–307

    Google Scholar 

  109. Hoch JE (2013) Shared leadership and innovation: the role of vertical leadership and employee integrity. J Bus Psychol 28(2):159–174

    Google Scholar 

  110. Hoch JE, Dulebohn JH (2017) Team personality composition, emergent leadership and shared leadership in virtual teams: a theoretical framework. Hum Resour Manag Rev 27(4):678–693

    Google Scholar 

  111. Hoch JE, Kozlowski SW (2014) Leading virtual teams: hierarchical leadership, structural supports, and shared team leadership. J Appl Psychol 99(3):390

    Google Scholar 

  112. Hofstede G (1980) Culture’s consequence international differences in work-related values. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  113. Hofstede G (1991) Organizations and cultures: software of the mind. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  114. Hofstede G (2001) Culture’s consequences: comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  115. Hollenbeck JR, Beersma B, Schouten ME (2012) Beyond team types and taxonomies: a dimensional scaling conceptualization for team description. Acad Manag Rev 37(1):82–106

    Google Scholar 

  116. Holmstrom H, Conchúir EÓ, Agerfalk J, Fitzgerald B (2006) Global software development challenges: a case study on temporal, geographical and socio-cultural distance. In: Proceedings of ICGSE’06. IEEE, New York, pp 3–11

  117. Homan AC, Van Knippenberg D, Van Kleef GA, De Dreu CK (2007) Bridging faultlines by valuing diversity: diversity beliefs, information elaboration, and performance in diverse work groups. J Appl Psychol 92(5):1189

    Google Scholar 

  118. Huang D (2015) Temporal evolution of multi-author papers in basic sciences from 1960 to 2010. Scientometrics 105(3):2137–2147

    Google Scholar 

  119. Hudson SE, Smith I (1996) Techniques for addressing fundamental privacy and disruption trade-offs in awareness support systems. In: Proceedings of CSCW’96. ACM, New York, CSCW’96, pp 248–257. https://doi.org/10.1145/240080.240295

  120. Imsland V, Sahay S, Wartiainen Y (2003) Key issues in managing a global software outsourcing relationship between a Norwegian and Russian firm: some practical implications. In: Proceedings of IRIS26

  121. Inc ZC (2020) Zoom for video, conferencing, and phones. https://zoom.us/

  122. Jakobsen CH, McLaughlin WJ (2004) Communication in ecosystem management: a case study of cross-disciplinary integration in the assessment phase of the Interior Columbia Basin Ecosystem Management Project. Environ Manag 33(5):591–605

    Google Scholar 

  123. Jarvenpaa SL, Leidner DE (1998) Communication and trust in global virtual teams. JCMC 3(4):791–815

    Google Scholar 

  124. Jarvenpaa SL, Shaw TR, Staples DS (2004) Toward contextualized theories of trust: the role of trust in global virtual teams. Inf Syst Res 15(3):250–267

    Google Scholar 

  125. Jehn KA (1997) A qualitative analysis of conflict types and dimensions in organizational groups. Adm Sci Q 42:530–557

    Google Scholar 

  126. Johnson SK, Bettenhausen K, Gibbons E (2009) Realities of working in virtual teams: affective and attitudinal outcomes of using computer-mediated communication. Small Group Res 40(6):623–649

    Google Scholar 

  127. Johnson-Laird PN (1989) Mental models. The MIT Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  128. Kanawattanachai P, Yoo Y (2002) Dynamic nature of trust in virtual teams. J Strateg Inf Syst 11(3–4):187–213

    Google Scholar 

  129. Kaplan AM, Haenlein M (2010) Users of the world, unite! the challenges and opportunities of social media. Bus Horiz 53(1):59–68

    Google Scholar 

  130. Kayworth T, Leidner D (2000) The global virtual manager: a prescription for success. Eur Manag J 18(2):183–194

    Google Scholar 

  131. Kayworth TR, Leidner DE (2002) Leadership effectiveness in global virtual teams. J Manag Inf Syst 18(3):7–40

    Google Scholar 

  132. Kiel L (2003) Experiences in distributed development: a case study. In: Proceedings of international workshop on global software development at ICSE’03

  133. Kiesler S, Cummings JN (2002) What do we know about proximity and distance in work groups? A legacy of research. In: Distributed work, vol 1. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 57–80

  134. Kimmerle J, Cress U (2007) Group awareness and self-presentation in the information-exchange dilemma: an interactional approach. In: Proceedings of CSCL’07. International Society of the Learning Sciences, New York, pp 370–378

  135. Kirkman BL, Shapiro DL (2005) The impact of cultural value diversity on multicultural team performance. Adv Int Manag 18:33–67

    Google Scholar 

  136. Kirkman BL, Rosen B, Tesluk PE, Gibson CB (2004) The impact of team empowerment on virtual team performance: the moderating role of face-to-face interaction. Acad Manag J 47(2):175–192

    Google Scholar 

  137. Kitchenham B, Brereton P (2013) A systematic review of systematic review process research in software engineering. Inf Softw Technol 55(12):2049–2075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2013.07.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  138. Kitchenham B, Charters S (2007) Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering version 2.3. Engineering 45(4ve):1051

    Google Scholar 

  139. Kittler MG, Rygl D, Mackinnon A (2011) Special review article: beyond culture or beyond control? Reviewing the use of Hall’s high-/low-context concept. Int J Cross Cult Manag 11(1):63–82

    Google Scholar 

  140. Klitmøller A, Lauring J (2013) When global virtual teams share knowledge: media richness, cultural difference and language commonality. J World Bus 48(3):398–406

    Google Scholar 

  141. Koehne B, Shih PC, Olson JS (2012) Remote and alone: coping with being the remote member on the team. In: Proceedings of CSCW’12. ACM, New York, pp 1257–1266

  142. Kotlarsky J, Oshri I (2005) Social ties, knowledge sharing and successful collaboration in globally distributed system development projects. Eur J Inf Syst 14(1):37–48

    Google Scholar 

  143. Kramer WS, Shuffler ML, Feitosa J (2017) The world is not flat: examining the interactive multidimensionality of culture and virtuality in teams. Hum Resour Manag Rev 27(4):604–620

    Google Scholar 

  144. Kraut RE, Fussell SR, Brennan SE, Siege J (2002) Understanding effects of proximity on collaboration: implications for technologies to support remote collaborative work. In: Hinds P, Kiesler S (eds) Distributed work. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 137–162

    Google Scholar 

  145. Krishna S, Sahay S, Walsham G (2004) Managing cross-cultural issues in global software outsourcing. Commun ACM 47(4):62–66

    Google Scholar 

  146. Kroll J, Hashmi SI, Richardson I, Audy JL (2013) A systematic literature review of best practices and challenges in follow-the-sun software development. In: Proceedings of international workshop on global software development at ICSE’13. IEEE, New York, pp 18–23

  147. Kuo Fy, Yu Cp (2009) An exploratory study of trust dynamics in work-oriented virtual teams. J Comput Med Commun 14(4):823–854

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  148. Lau DC, Murnighan JK (2005) Interactions within groups and subgroups: the effects of demographic faultlines. Acad Manag J 48(4):645–659

    Google Scholar 

  149. Leung K, Bhagat R, Buchan N, Erez M, Gibson C (2011) Beyond national culture and culture-centricism: an integrating perspective on the role of culture in international business. J Int Bus Stud 42:177–181

    Google Scholar 

  150. Liao C (2017) Leadership in virtual teams: a multilevel perspective. Hum Resour Manag Rev 27(4):648–659

    Google Scholar 

  151. Lipnack J, Stamps J (1997) Virtual teams: reaching across space, time, and organizations with technology. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  152. Livingston G, Waring B, Pacheco LF, Buchori D, Jiang Y, Gilbert L, Jha S (2016) Perspectives on the global disparity in ecological science. Bioscience 66(2):147–155

    Google Scholar 

  153. López G, Guerrero LA (2014) Notifications for collaborative documents editing. In: Proceedings of UCAmI’14. Springer, Berlin, pp 80–87

  154. López G, Guerrero LA (2017) Awareness supporting technologies used in collaborative systems: a systematic literature review. In: Proceedings of CSCW’17. ACM, New York, pp 808–820

  155. Lowry PB, Zhang D, Zhou L, Fu X (2010) Effects of culture, social presence, and group composition on trust in technology-supported decision-making groups. Inf Syst J 20(3):297–315

    Google Scholar 

  156. Lu LC, Chang HH, Yu ST (2011) The role of individualism and collectivism in consumer perceptions toward e-retailers’ ethics. In: 2011 international conference on information management, innovation management and industrial engineering, vol 2. IEEE, New York, pp 194–197

  157. Malhotra A, Majchrzak A, Rosen B (2007) Leading virtual teams. Acad Manag Perspect 21(1):60–70

    Google Scholar 

  158. Malone TW, Crowston K (1994) The interdisciplinary study of coordination. CSUR 26(1):87–119

    Google Scholar 

  159. Mannix EA, Griffith T, Neale MA (2002) The phenomenology of conflict in distributed work teams. In: Hinds P, Kiesler S (eds) Distributed work. The MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 213–233

    Google Scholar 

  160. Mantei MM, Baecker RM, Sellen AJ, Buxton WA, Milligan T, Wellman B (1991) Experiences in the use of a media space. In: Proceedings of CHI’91. ACM, New York, pp 203–208

  161. Mark G (2002) Extreme collaboration. Commun ACM 45(6):89–93

    Google Scholar 

  162. Marlow J, Dabbish L (2012) Designing interventions to reduce psychological distance in globally distributed teams. In: Proceedings of CSCW’12 companion. ACM, New York, pp 163–166

  163. Marlow SL, Lacerenza CN, Salas E (2017) Communication in virtual teams: a conceptual framework and research agenda. Hum Resour Manag Rev 27(4):575–589

    Google Scholar 

  164. Martins LL, Shalley CE (2011) Creativity in virtual work: effects of demographic differences. Small Group Res 42(5):536–561

    Google Scholar 

  165. Maruping LM, Agarwal R (2004) Managing team interpersonal processes through technology: a task-technology fit perspective. J Appl Psychol 89(6):975

    Google Scholar 

  166. Maruping LM, Magni M (2015) Motivating employees to explore collaboration technology in team contexts. Mis Quarterly 39(1):1–16

    Google Scholar 

  167. Mattessich PW, Monsey BR (1992) Collaboration: what makes it work. A review of research literature on factors influencing successful collaboration. ERIC, St. Paul

  168. Maynard MT, Gilson LL (2014) The role of shared mental model development in understanding virtual team effectiveness. Group Organ Manag 39(1):3–32

    Google Scholar 

  169. Maynard MT, Mathieu JE, Rapp TL, Gilson LL (2012) Something (s) old and something (s) new: modeling drivers of global virtual team effectiveness. J Organ Behav 33(3):342–365

    Google Scholar 

  170. McDonough EF, Kahnb KB, Barczaka G (2001) An investigation of the use of global, virtual, and colocated new product development teams. J Prod Innov Manag 18(2):110–120

    Google Scholar 

  171. McGuffin LJ, Olson GM (1992) ShrEdit: a shared electronic work space. University of Michigan, Cognitive Science and Machine Intelligence Laboratory, Ann Arbor

  172. McIntyre NE, Knowles-Yánez K, Hope D (2000) Urban ecology as an interdisciplinary field: differences in the use of “‘urban” between the social and natural sciences. Urban Ecosys 4(1):5–24

    Google Scholar 

  173. McNamara K, Dennis AR, Carte TA (2008) It’s the thought that counts: the mediating effects of information processing in virtual team decision making. Inf Syst Manag 25(1):20–32

    Google Scholar 

  174. Meyerson D, Weick KE, Kramer RM et al (1996) Swift trust and temporary groups. Trust Organ Front Theory Res 166:195

    Google Scholar 

  175. Microsoft (2017) Skype. http://www.skype.com/en/

  176. Microsoft (2020) Microsoft teams. https://products.office.com/en-us/microsoft-teams/group-chat-software

  177. Milliken FJ, Martins LL (1996) Searching for common threads: understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational groups. Acad Manag Rev 21(2):402–433

    Google Scholar 

  178. Montoya MM, Massey AP, Hung YTC, Crisp CB (2009) Can you hear me now? Communication in virtual product development teams. J Prod Innov Manag 26(2):139–155

    Google Scholar 

  179. Mortensen M, Hinds PJ (2001) Conflict and shared identity in geographically distributed teams. Int J Confl Manag 12(3):212–238

    Google Scholar 

  180. Navimipour NJ, Charband Y (2016) Knowledge sharing mechanisms and techniques in project teams: literature review, classification, and current trends. Comput Hum Behav 62:730–742

    Google Scholar 

  181. Neuliep JW (2020) Intercultural communication: a contextual approach. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  182. Newman SA, Ford RC, Marshall GW (2019) Virtual team leader communication: employee perception and organizational reality. Int J Bus Commun. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488419829895

    Article  Google Scholar 

  183. Nguyen-Duc A, Cruzes D, Conradi R (2012) Dispersion, coordination and performance in global software teams: a systematic review. In: Proceedings of ESEM’12. ACM, New York, pp 129–138

  184. Nguyen-Duc A, Cruzes DS, Conradi R (2015) The impact of global dispersion on coordination, team performance and software quality—a systematic literature review. Inf Softw Technol 57:277–294

    Google Scholar 

  185. Noll J, Beecham S, Richardson I (2010) Global software development and collaboration: barriers and solutions. ACM Inroads 1(3):66–78

    Google Scholar 

  186. O’Hara-Devereaux M, Johansen R (1994) Globalwork: bridging distance, culture, and time. Jossey-Bass Pub, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  187. O’Leary MB, Cummings JN (2007) The spatial, temporal, and configurational characteristics of geographic dispersion in teams. Manag Inf Syst Q 31(3):433–452

    Google Scholar 

  188. O’Leary MB, Mortensen M (2010) Go (con) figure: subgroups, imbalance, and isolates in geographically dispersed teams. Organ Sci 21(1):115–131

    Google Scholar 

  189. O’Leary MB, Wilson JM, Metiu A (2012) Beyond being there: the symbolic role of communication and identification in the emergence of perceived proximity in geographically dispersed work. ESSEC working paper 1112

  190. Olson G, Ackerman M, Atkins D, Bos N, Derrick C, Cohen M, Finholt T, Furnas G, Hedstrom M, Herbsleb J, Myers J, Olson J, Prakash A, Radev D, Teasley S, Trimble J, Weymouth T, Elizabeth Yakel, Zimmerman A, Cooney D, Hardin J, Hofer E, Knoop P, Peters G, Verhey-Henke A, Bietz M, Birnholtz J, Luo A, Potter A, Puetz M, Yew J (2006) Science of collaboratories. http://soc.ics.uci.edu/

  191. Olson GM, Olson JS (2000) Distance matters. Hum Comput Interact 15(2):139–178

    Google Scholar 

  192. Olson GM, Zimmerman A, Bos N (2008) Scientific collaboration on the Internet. The MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  193. Olson JS, Olson GM (2006) Bridging distance: empirical studies of distributed teams. In: Proceedings of human factors in MIS’06, vol 2, pp 27–30

  194. Olson JS, Olson GM (2013) Working together apart: collaboration over the internet. Synth Lect Hum Center Inform 6(5):1–151

    Google Scholar 

  195. O’Reilly CA, Williams KY, Barsade S (1997) Demography and group performance: does diversity help? Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, Stanford

  196. Orlikowski WJ (2002) Knowing in practice: enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing. Organ Sci 13(3):249–273

    Google Scholar 

  197. Otjacques B, McCall R, Feltz F (2006) An ambient workplace for raising awareness of internet-based cooperation. In: Proceedings of CDVE’06. LNCS, London, pp 275–286

  198. O’Neill TA, Hancock SE, Zivkov K, Larson NL, Law SJ (2016) Team decision making in virtual and face-to-face environments. Group Decis Negot 25(5):995–1020

    Google Scholar 

  199. Pan RK, Kaski K, Fortunato S (2012) World citation and collaboration networks: uncovering the role of geography in science. Sci Rep 2:902

    Google Scholar 

  200. Parreira MR, Machado KB, Logares R, Diniz-Filho JAF, Nabout JC (2017) The roles of geographic distance and socioeconomic factors on international collaboration among ecologists. Scientometrics 113(3):1539–1550

    Google Scholar 

  201. Patel H, Pettitt M, Wilson JR (2012) Factors of collaborative working: a framework for a collaboration model. Appl Ergon 43(1):1–26

    Google Scholar 

  202. Paul DL, McDaniel RR Jr (2004) A field study of the effect of interpersonal trust on virtual collaborative relationship performance. Manag Inf Syst Q 28:183–227

    Google Scholar 

  203. Pearce WB (1974) Trust in interpersonal communication. CM 41(3):236–44

    Google Scholar 

  204. Pelled LH (1996) Demographic diversity, conflict, and work group outcomes: an intervening process theory. Organ Sci 7(6):615–631

    Google Scholar 

  205. Pelled LH, Eisenhardt KM, Xin KR (1999) Exploring the black box: an analysis of work group diversity, conflict and performance. Adm Sci Q 44(1):1–28

    Google Scholar 

  206. Pe narroja V, Orengo V, Zornoza A, Hernández A (2013) The effects of virtuality level on task-related collaborative behaviors: the mediating role of team trust. Comput Hum Behav 29(3):967–974

    Google Scholar 

  207. Pe narroja V, Orengo V, Zornoza A (2017) Reducing perceived social loafing in virtual teams: the effect of team feedback with guided reflexivity. J Appl Soc Psychol 47(8):424–435

    Google Scholar 

  208. Pinjani P, Palvia P (2013) Trust and knowledge sharing in diverse global virtual teams. Inf Manag 50(4):144–153

    Google Scholar 

  209. Pivotal Software (2017) Agile project management. https://www.pivotaltracker.com/

  210. Polzer JT, Crisp CB, Jarvenpaa SL, Kim JW (2006) Extending the faultline model to geographically dispersed teams: how colocated subgroups can impair group functioning. Acad Manag J 49(4):679–692

    Google Scholar 

  211. Ponds R, Van Oort F, Frenken K (2007) The geographical and institutional proximity of research collaboration. Pap Reg Sci 86(3):423–443

    Google Scholar 

  212. Rains SA (2005) Leveling the organizational playing field-virtually: a meta-analysis of experimental research assessing the impact of group support system use on member influence behaviors. Commun Res 32(2):193–234

    Google Scholar 

  213. Ramasubbu N, Cataldo M, Balan RK, Herbsleb JD (2011) Configuring global software teams: a multi-company analysis of project productivity, quality, and profits. In: Proceedings of ICSE’11. ACM, New York, pp 261–270

  214. Raymond E (1999) Homesteading the Noosphere, the Cathedral, and the Bazaar: Musings on Linux and Open Source by an Accidental Revolutionary. O’Reilly & Associates, Sebastopol Calf

    Google Scholar 

  215. Robert LP (2016) Far but near or near but far? The effects of perceived distance on the relationship between geographic dispersion and perceived diversity. In: Proceedings of CHI’16. ACM, New York, pp 2461–2473. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858534

  216. Robert LP, Denis AR, Hung YTC (2009) Individual swift trust and knowledge-based trust in face-to-face and virtual team members. J Manag Inf Syst 26(2):241–279

    Google Scholar 

  217. Robert LP Jr, You S (2018) Are you satisfied yet? Shared leadership, individual trust, autonomy, and satisfaction in virtual teams. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol 69(4):503–513

    Google Scholar 

  218. Rusman E, Van Bruggen J, Sloep P, Koper R (2010) Fostering trust in virtual project teams: towards a design framework grounded in a trustworthiness antecedents (TWAN) schema. Int J Hum Comput Stud 68(11):834–850

    Google Scholar 

  219. Sarker S, Sahay S (2004) Implications of space and time for distributed work: an interpretive study of US–Norwegian systems development teams. Eur J Inf Syst 13(1):3–20

    Google Scholar 

  220. Sarker S, Ahuja M, Sarker S, Kirkeby S (2011) The role of communication and trust in global virtual teams: a social network perspective. J Manag Inf Syst 28(1):273–310

    Google Scholar 

  221. Saunders C, Van Slyke C, Vogel DR (2004) My time or yours? Managing time visions in global virtual teams. Acad Manag Perspect 18(1):19–37

    Google Scholar 

  222. Saunders C, Van Slyke C, Vogel DR (2004) My time or yours? Managing time visions in global virtual teams. Acad Manag J 18(1):19–37

    Google Scholar 

  223. Schaubroeck JM, Yu A (2017) When does virtuality help or hinder teams? Core team characteristics as contingency factors. Hum Resour Manag Rev 27(4):635–647

    Google Scholar 

  224. Schmidt K (2002) The problem with “awareness”: introductory remarks on “awareness in CSCW”. Comput Supported Coop Work 11(3):285–298. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021272909573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  225. Schmidt K, Bannon L (1992) Taking CSCW seriously. J CSCW 1(1–2):7–40

    Google Scholar 

  226. Schmidtke JM, Cummings A (2017) The effects of virtualness on teamwork behavioral components: the role of shared mental models. Hum Resour Manag Rev 27(4):660–677

    Google Scholar 

  227. Schneier CE, Goktepe JR (1983) Issues in emergent leadership: the contingency model of leadership, leader sex, leader behavior. Small Groups Soc Interact 1:413–421

    Google Scholar 

  228. Scott CPR, Wildman JL (2015) Culture, communication, and conflict: a review of the global virtual team literature. Springer, New York, pp 13–32

    Google Scholar 

  229. Scrumwise Inc (2017) The easiest scrum tool you’ll find. https://www.scrumwise.com/

  230. See M (2018) 18 international collaboration: are the challenges worth the benefits? J Anim Sci 96(suppl–3):2–2

    Google Scholar 

  231. Siebdrat F, Hoegl M, Ernst H (2014) Subjective distance and team collaboration in distributed teams. J Prod Innov Manag 31(4):765–779

    Google Scholar 

  232. Slack (2017) Where work happens. https://slack.com/

  233. Šmite D, Wohlin C, Gorschek T, Feldt R (2010) Empirical evidence in global software engineering: a systematic review. Empir Softw Eng 15(1):91–118

    Google Scholar 

  234. Sole D, Edmondson A (2002) Situated knowledge and learning in dispersed teams. Br J Manag 13(S2):S17–S34

    Google Scholar 

  235. Solomon C (2016) Trends in global virtual teams. https://www.rw-3.com/resource-center/2016-survey-report-trends-in-global-virtual-teams

  236. Srivastava A, Bartol KM, Locke EA (2006) Empowering leadership in management teams: effects on knowledge sharing, efficacy, and performance. Acad Manag J 49(6):1239–1251

    Google Scholar 

  237. Stahl GK, Maznevski ML, Voigt A, Jonsen K (2010) Unraveling the effects of cultural diversity in teams: a meta-analysis of research on multicultural work groups. J Int Bus Stud 41(4):690–709

    Google Scholar 

  238. Staples DS, Zhao L (2006) The effects of cultural diversity in virtual teams versus face-to-face teams. Group Decis Negot 15(4):389–406

    Google Scholar 

  239. Steinmacher I, Chaves AP, Gerosa MA (2013) Awareness support in distributed software development: a systematic review and mapping of the literature. J CSCW 22(2–3):113–158

    Google Scholar 

  240. Straub D, Loch K, Evaristo R, Karahanna E, Srite M (2002) Toward a theory-based measurement of culture. J Glob Inf Manag (JGIM) 10(1):13–23

    Google Scholar 

  241. Strauss A (1988) The articulation of project work: an organizational process. Sociol Q 29:163–178

    Google Scholar 

  242. Swigger K, Alpaslan F, Brazile R, Monticino M (2004) Effects of culture on computer-supported international collaborations. Int J Hum Comput Stud 60(3):365–380

    Google Scholar 

  243. Tang JC, Zhao C, Cao X, Inkpen K (2011) Your time zone or mine? A study of globally time zone-shifted collaboration. In: Proceedings of CSCW’11. ACM, New York, pp 235–244

  244. Tangirala S, Alge BJ (2006) Reactions to unfair events in computer-mediated groups: a test of uncertainty management theory. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 100(1):1–20

    Google Scholar 

  245. Taras V, Kirkman BL, Steel P (2010) Examining the impact of culture’s consequences: a three-decade, multilevel, meta-analytic review of Hofstede’s cultural value dimensions. J Appl Psychol 95(3):405

    Google Scholar 

  246. Teasley S, Covi L, Krishnan MS, Olson JS (2000) How does radical collocation help a team succeed? In: Proceedings of CSCW’00. ACM, New York, pp 339–346

  247. Tenopir C, Allard S, Douglass K, Aydinoglu AU, Wu L, Read E, Manoff M, Frame M (2011) Data sharing by scientists: practices and perceptions. PLoS ONE 6(6):e21101

    Google Scholar 

  248. Tenzer H, Pudelko M, Harzing AW (2014) The impact of language barriers on trust formation in multinational teams. J Int Bus Stud 45(5):508–535

    Google Scholar 

  249. Tran H, Zdun U et al (2017) Systematic review of software behavioral model consistency checking. CSUR 50(2):17

    Google Scholar 

  250. Treinen JJ, Miller-Frost SL (2006) Following the sun: case studies in global software development. IBM J Res Dev 45(4):773–783

    Google Scholar 

  251. Trello Inc (2017) Trello. https://trello.com/

  252. Tress G, Tress B, Fry G (2007) Analysis of the barriers to integration in landscape research projects. Land Use Policy 24(2):374–385

    Google Scholar 

  253. Triandis HC, Singelis TM (1998) Training to recognize individual differences in collectivism and individualism within culture. Int J Intercult Relat 22(1):35–47

    Google Scholar 

  254. Triandis HC, Bontempo R, Villareal MJ, Asai M, Lucca N (1988) Individualism and collectivism: cross-cultural perspectives on self-ingroup relationships. J Pers Soc Psychol 54(2):323

    Google Scholar 

  255. Umphress EE, Smith-Crowe K, Brief AP, Dietz J, Watkins MB (2007) When birds of a feather flock together and when they do not: status composition, social dominance orientation, and organizational attractiveness. J Appl Psychol 92(2):396

    Google Scholar 

  256. Vaccaro A, Veloso F, Brusoni S (2009) The impact of virtual technologies on knowledge-based processes: an empirical study. Res Policy 38(8):1278–1287

    Google Scholar 

  257. Van den Bulte C, Moenaert RK (1998) The effects of R&D team co-location on communication patterns among R&D, marketing, and manufacturing. Manag Sci 44(11–part–2):S1–S18

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  258. van Solingen R, Basili V, Caldiera G, Rombach HD (2002) Goal question metric (GQM) approach. In: Marciniak JJ (ed) Encyclopedia of software engineering. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471028959.sof142

  259. Van Weijen D (2012) The language of (future) scientific communication. Res Trends 31(11):2012

    Google Scholar 

  260. Wakefield RL, Leidner DE, Garrison G (2008) Research note—a model of conflict, leadership, and performance in virtual teams. Inf Syst Res 19(4):434–455

    Google Scholar 

  261. Walsh JP, Maloney NG (2007) Collaboration structure, communication media, and problems in scientific work teams. J Comput Mediat Commun 12(2):712–732

    Google Scholar 

  262. Walther JB, Bunz U (2005) The rules of virtual groups: trust, liking, and performance in computer-mediated communication. J Commun 55(4):828–846

    Google Scholar 

  263. Warkentin ME, Sayeed L, Hightower R (1997) Virtual teams versus face-to-face teams: an exploratory study of a web-based conference system. Decis Sci 28(4):975–996

    Google Scholar 

  264. Watson WE, Kumar K, Michaelsen LK (1993) Cultural diversity’s impact on interaction process and performance: comparing homogeneous and diverse task groups. Acad Manag J 36(3):590–602

    Google Scholar 

  265. Watson-Manheim MB, Chudoba KM, Crowston K (2002) Discontinuities and continuities: a new way to understand virtual work. ITP 15(3):191–209

    Google Scholar 

  266. Watson-Manheim MB, Chudoba KM, Crowston K (2012) Perceived discontinuities and constructed continuities in virtual work. Inf Syst J 22(1):29–52

    Google Scholar 

  267. Weinel M, Bannert M, Zumbach J, Hoppe HU, Malzahn N (2011) A closer look on social presence as a causing factor in computer-mediated collaboration. Comput Hum Behav 27(1):513–521

    Google Scholar 

  268. Wiersema MF, Bantel KA (1992) Top management team demography and corporate strategic change. Acad Manag J 35(1):91–121

    Google Scholar 

  269. Williams K, O’Reilly C III (1998) Demography and diversity in organisations: a review of 40 years of research. In: Staw BM, Cummings LL (eds) Research in organisational behaviour. Jai Pres, Greenwich

    Google Scholar 

  270. Wilson JM, Boyer O’Leary M, Metiu A, Jett QR (2008) Perceived proximity in virtual work: explaining the paradox of far-but-close. Organ Stud 29(7):979–1002

    Google Scholar 

  271. Zander L, Zettinig P, Mäkelä K (2013) Leading global virtual teams to success. Org Dyn 42(3 SI):228–237

    Google Scholar 

  272. Zellmer-Bruhn ME, Gibson CB (2013) How does culture matter. In: Yuki M, Brewer M (eds) Culture and group processes, p 166. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=DtI8BAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA166&dq=Zellmer-Bruhn+ME,+Gibson+CB+(2013)+How+does+culture+matter.+In:+Culture+and+group+processes,+p+166&ots=wE-qqLV173&sig=svs8MQKVi40vMB_fixB86FyRmdQ#v=onepage&q&f=false

  273. Zolin R, Hinds PJ, Fruchter R, Levitt RE (2004) Interpersonal trust in cross-functional, geographically distributed work: a longitudinal study. Inf Organ 14(1):1–26

    Google Scholar 


Page 2

From: Challenges and barriers in virtual teams: a literature review

Type # Description
Inclusion I1 Paper is concerned with collaboration
I2 Paper contains empirical evidence
I3 Findings are generalizable
Exclusion E1 Paper is not written in English
E2 Paper is not peer-reviewed (e.g., master’s thesis)
E3 Paper is not related to at least one of the research questions
E4 Duplicate paper