What does the term “consistency” mean in the context of public opinion?

Antaki, Charles, & Leudar, Ivan (2001). Recruiting the record: Using opponents’ exact words in parliamentary argumentation. Text 21(4):467–88.10.1515/text.2001.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Austin, John L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford: Claredon Press.Google Scholar

Balmas, Meital; Rahat, Gideon; Sheafer, Tamir; & Shenhav, Shaul R. (2014). Two routes to personalized politics: Centralized and decentralized personalization. Party Politics 20(1):37–51.10.1177/1354068811436037CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Janet B., Bavelas; Black, Alex; Chovil, Nicole; & Mullett, Jennifer (1990). Equivocal communication. London: SAGE.Google Scholar

Billig, Michael (1987). Arguing and thinking: A rhetorical approach to social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Blumler, Jay G., & Kavanagh, Dennis (1999). The third age of political communication: Influences and features. Political Communication 16(3):209–30.10.1080/105846099198596CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bull, Peter; Elliott, July; Palmer, Derrol; & Walker, Libby (1996). Why politicians are three-faced: The face model of political interviews. British Journal of Social Psychology 35(2):267–84.10.1111/j.2044-8309.1996.tb01097.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chilton, Paul (1990). Politeness, politics, and diplomacy. Discourse & Society 1(2):201–24.10.1177/0957926590001002005CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cialdini, Robert B. (1993). The psychology of influence. New York: William Morrow & Co.Google Scholar

Clayman, Steven E. (1995). Defining moments, presidential debates, and the dynamics of quotability. Journal of Communication 45(3):118–46.10.1111/j.1460-2466.1995.tb00746.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cohen, Ted (1973). Illocutions and perlocutions. Foundations of Language 9:492–503.Google Scholar

Craig, Robert T. (2008). Metadiscourse. In Donsbach, Wolfgang (ed.), The international encyclopedia of communication, 1–3. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

De Cillia, Rudolf; Reisigl, Martin; & Wodak, Ruth (1999). The discursive construction of national identities. Discourse & Society 10(2):149–73.10.1177/0957926599010002002CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Duranti, Alessandro (2006). Narrating the political self in a campaign for US congress. Language in Society 35(4):467–97.10.1017/S0047404506060222CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eagleton, Terry (1991). Ideology: An introduction. London: Verso.Google Scholar

Edwards III, George C., & Wayne, Stephen J. (2013). Presidential leadership: Politics and policy making. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.Google Scholar

Festinger, Leon, & Carlsmith, James A. (1959). Cognitive consequences of forced compliance. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 58(2):203–10.10.1037/h0041593CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Friedman, Elie, & Kampf, Zohar (2014). Politically speaking at home and abroad: A typology of message gap strategies. Discourse & Society 25(6):1–19.10.1177/0957926514536836CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Friedman, Elie; Kampf, Zohar; & Balmas, Meital (2017). Exploring message targeting at home and abroad: The role of political and media considerations in the rhetorical dynamics of conflict resolution. International Journal of Communication 11(2017):1597–1617.Google Scholar

Goffman, Erving (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar

Gruber, Helmut (1993). Political language and textual vagueness. Pragmatics 3(1):1–28.10.1075/prag.3.1.01gruCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ilie, Cornelia (2003). Discourse and metadiscourse in parliamentary debates. Journal of Language and Politics 2(1):71–92.10.1075/jlp.2.1.05iliCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Janis, Irving L. (1972). Victims of groupthink. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar

Kampf, Zohar (2013). Mediated performatives. In Östman, Jan-Ola & Verschueren, Jef (eds.), Handbook of pragmatics: 2013 installment, 1–24. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Kampf, Zohar, & Katriel, Tamar (2016). Political condemnations: Public speech acts and the moralization of discourse. In Carbaugh, Donal (ed.), The handbook of communication in cross-cultural perspective, 312–26. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Katriel, Tamar (1986). Talking straight: Dugri speech in Israeli sabra culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Koller, Veronika, & Davidson, Paul (2008). Social exclusion as conceptual and grammatical metaphor: A cross-genre study of British policy-making. Discourse & Society 19(3):307–31.10.1177/0957926508088963CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lakoff, George (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In Ortony, Andrew (ed.), Metaphor and thought, 202–51. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139173865.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lamberg, Juha-Anti, & Parvinen, Petri (2003). The river metaphor for strategic management. European Management Journal 21(5):549–57.10.1016/S0263-2373(03)00104-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lempert, Michael (2009). On ‘flip-flopping’: Branded stance-taking in US electoral politics. Journal of Sociolinguistics 13:223–48.10.1111/j.1467-9841.2009.00405.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lempert, Michael (2011). Avoiding the issues as addressivity in US electoral politics. Anthropological Quarterly 84(1):187–208.10.1353/anq.2011.0016CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lempert, Michael, & Silverstein, Michael (2012). Creatures of politics: Media, message, and the American presidency. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Levy, Jonah D. (2006). The state after statism: New state activities in the age of liberalization. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Lijphart, Arend (2012). Patterns of democracy: Government forms and performance in thirty-six countries. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Martin, Lanny W., & Vanberg, Georg (2011). Parliaments and coalitions: The role of legislative institutions in multiparty governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199607884.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martinez Guillem, Susana (2009). Argumentation, metadiscourse and social cognition: Organizing knowledge in political communication. Discourse & Society 20(6):727–46.10.1177/0957926509342368CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mayer, Roger C.; Davis, James H.; & David Schoorman, F. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review 20(3):709–34.10.5465/amr.1995.9508080335CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meade, Melissa R., & Robles, Jessica S. (2017). Historical and existential coherence in political commercials. Discourse & Communication 11(4):404–32.10.1177/1750481317707560CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Montpetit, Eric (2012). Does holding beliefs with conviction prevent policy actors from adopting a compromising attitude? Political Studies 60:621–42.10.1111/j.1467-9248.2011.00930.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar

MSN website (2010, February 4). Online: digger.ifat.com.Google Scholar

Naurin, Elin (2011). Election promises, party behavior and voter perceptions. Chippenham: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230319301CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Neuman, Yair, & Tabak, Iris (2003). Inconsistency as an interactional problem: A lesson from political rhetoric. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 32(3):251–67.10.1023/A:1023569501293CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Norris, Pippa (2011). Democratic deficit: Critical citizens revisited. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511973383CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ochs, Elinor, & Capps, Lisa (2001). Living narrative: Creating lives in everyday storytelling. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Peterson, Michael B.; Slothuus, Rune; & Togeby, Lise (2010). Political parties and value consistency in public opinion formation. Public Opinion Quarterly 73(3):530–50.10.1093/poq/nfq005CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Petrocik, John R. (1996). Issue ownership in presidential elections, with a 1980 case study. American Journal of Political Science 40(3):825–50.10.2307/2111797CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Putnam, Robert D. (1988). Diplomacy and domestic politics: The logic of two-level games. International Organization 42(3):427–60.10.1017/S0020818300027697CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rahat, Gideon, & Hazan, Reuven Y. (2013). Increased personalization in an unstable party system: The 2013 elections in Israel. Representation 49(3):375–89.10.1080/00344893.2013.830477CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rahat, Gideon; Hazan, Reuven Y.; & Bloom, Pazit Ben-Nun (2016). Stable blocs and multiple identities: The 2015 elections in Israel. Representation 52(1):99–117.10.1080/00344893.2016.1190592CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sartori, Giovanni (1976). Parties and party systems: A framework for analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Sbisà, Marina (2009). Uptake and conventionality in illocution. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 5(1):33–52.10.2478/v10016-009-0003-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schudson, Michael (1999). Social origins of press cynicism in portraying politics. American Behavioral Scientist 42(6):998–1008.10.1177/00027649921954714CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sclafani, Jennifer (2015). Family as a framing resource for political identity construction: Introduction sequences in presidential primary debates. Language in Society 44(3):369–99.10.1017/S0047404515000238CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shamir, Michal, & Arian, Asher (1999). Collective identity and electoral competition in Israel. The American Political Science Review 93(2):265–77.10.2307/2585395CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shenhav, Shaul R.; Sheafer, Tamir; & Gabay, Itai (2010). Incoherent narrator: Israeli public diplomacy during the disengagement and the elections in the Palestinian Authority. Israel Studies 15(3):143–63.10.2979/isr.2010.15.3.143CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stapleton, Karyn, & Wilson, John (2009). Discourse and dissonance: Making sense of socio-political change in Northern Ireland. Journal of Pragmatics 41(7):1358–75.10.1016/j.pragma.2008.09.022CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stockton, Julie M. (2006). A ‘good soldier's tale’: The organizational construct of an archetype. Burnaby: Simon Fraser University dissertation.Google Scholar

Strömbäck, Jesper, & Esser, Frank (2014). Mediatization of politics: Towards a theoretical framework. In Strömbäck, Jesper & Esser, Frank (eds.), Mediatization of politics: Understanding the transformation of western democracies, 3–28. London: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9781137275844_1CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Teven, Jason J. (2008). An examination of perceived credibility of the 2008 presidential candidates: Relationships with believability, likeability, and deceptiveness. Human Communication 11:391–408.Google Scholar

Thompson, John B. (2000). Political scandal: Power and visibility in the media age. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Tolson, Andrew (2011). Conversational presentation and the politics of ‘trust’. In Ekström, Mats & Patrona, Marianna (eds.), Talking politics in broadcast media: Cross-cultural perspectives on political interviewing, 57–74. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/dapsac.42.07tolCrossRefGoogle Scholar

van Eemeren, Frans H., & Grootendorst, Rob (1984). Speech acts in argumentative discussions: A theoretical model for the analysis of discussions directed towards solving conflicts of opinion. Dordrecht: Floris.10.1515/9783110846089CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weizman, Elda (2008). Positioning in media dialogue: Negotiating roles in the news interview. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/ds.3CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wodak, Ruth (2009). The discourse of politics in action: Politics as usual. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Woodly, Deva (2018). The importance of public meaning for political persuasion. Perspectives on Politics 16(1):22–35.10.1017/S1537592717003127CrossRefGoogle Scholar