Diferença entre ISO 9001 e IATF 16949

IATF 16949:2016 is the international technical specification and quality management standard for the automotive industry based on ISO 9001:2015. It was created to be used in conjunction with ISO 9001:2015, containing all of ISO 9001:2015 requirements with additional supplemental requirements specific to the automotive industry rather than being a stand-alone QMS. If you are curious on how to account for the differences between the two standards we have created an ISO 9001:2015 to IATF 16949:2016 Gap Analysis Checklist.

If you are interested in implementing IATF 16949 into your organization we have many products that will help you:

ISO 9001 and IATF 16949 Correlation Matrix

Section	9001:2015 Section Title	IATF 16949 Additional Requirements
4	Context of the organization
4.1	Understanding the organization and its context
4.2	Understanding the needs and expectations of interested parties
4.3	Determining the scope of the quality management system	4.3.1 Determining the scope – Supplemental 4.3.2 Customer specific requirements
4.4	Quality management system and its processes	4.4.1.1 Conformance of products and processes 4.4.1.2 Product safety
5	Leadership
5.1	Leadership commitment	5.1.1.1Corporate responsibility5.1.1.2 Process effectiveness and efficiency 5.1.1.3 Process owners
5.2	Policy
5.3	Organizational roles, responsibilities and authorities	5.3.1 Organizational roles – Supplemental 5.3.2 Responsibility and authority for product requirements and corrective action
6	Planning
6.1	Actions to address risks and opportunities	6.1.2.1 Risk analysis6.1.2.2 Preventative action 6.1.2.3 Contingency plans
6.2	Quality objectives and planning to achieve them	6.2.2.1 Quality objectives – Supplemental
6.3	Planning of changes
7	Support
7.1	Resources	7.1.3.1 Plant, facility, and equipment planning, Environment for the operation of processes, 7.1.4.1 Environment for the operation of processes- supplemental7.1.5.1.1 Measurement systems analysis7.1.5.1.1 Measurement traceability7.1.5.2.1 Calibration/verification records 7.1.5.3.1/2Laboratory requirements
7.2	Competence	7.2.1 Competence – Supplemental7.2.2 On-the job training7.2.3 Internal auditor competency 7.2.4 Second-party auditor competency
7.3	Awareness	7.3.1 Awareness – Supplemental 7.3.2 Employee motivation and empowerment
7.4	Communication
7.5	Documented Information	7.5.1.1Quality management system documentation 7.5.3.2.1 Record retention 7.5.3.2.2 Engineering specifications
8	Operation
8.1	Operational planning and control	8.1.1 Operational planning – Supplemental 8.1.2 Confidentiality
8.2	Requirements for products and services	8.2.1 Customer communication – Supplemental,8.2.2.1 Determining the requirements -Supplemental8.2.3.1.2Customer – designated special characteristics 8.2.3.1.3 Organization manufacturing feasibility
8.3	Design and development of products and services	8.3.1.1 Design and development – Supplemental,8.3.2.1 Design planning – Supplemental8.3.2.2 Product design skills8.3.2.3 Development of products with embedded software8.3.3.1 Product design input8.3.3.2 Manufacturing process design input8.3.3.3 Special characteristics8.3.4.1 Monitoring8.3.4.2 Design and development validation8.3.4.3 Prototype program8.3.4.4 Product approval process8.3.5.1 Design and development outputs8.3.5.2 Manufacturing process design output 8.3.6.1 Design and development changes – Supplemental
8.4	Control of externally provided processes, products and services	8.4.1.1 General – Supplemental8.4.1.2 Supplier selection process,8.4.1.3 Customer-directed sources8.4.2.1 Control – Supplemental8.4.2.2 Statutory and regulatory requirements8.4.2.3 Supplier quality management system development8.4.2.3.1 Automotive product- related software8.4.2.4 Supplier monitoring8.4.2.4.1 Second-party audits8.4.2.5 Supplier development 8.4.3.1 External providers – Supplemental
8.5	Production and service provision	8.5.1.1 Control plan8.5.1.2 Standardized work8.5.1.3 Verification of job set-up8.5.1.4 Verification after shutdown8.5.1.5 Total productive maintenance8.5.1.6 Management of production tooling8.5.1.7 Production scheduling, Identification and traceability – Supplemental8.5.4.1 Preservation – Supplemental8.5.5.1Feedback from service8.5.5.2Service agreement with customer Control of changes – Supplemental 8.5.6.2 Temporary change of process controls
8.6	Release of products and services	8.6.1Release – Supplemental8.6.2 Layout inspection and functional testing8.6.3Appearance items8.6.4 Verification of conformity of externally provided products and services8.6.5 Statutory and regulatory conformity 8.6.6 Acceptance criteria
8.7	Control of nonconforming outputs	8.7.1.1 Customer authorization for concession8.7.1.2 Customer specified process8.7.1.3 Control of suspect product8.7.1.4 Control of reworked product8.7.1.5 Control of repaired product8.7.1.6 Customer notification 8.7.1.7 Nonconforming product disposition
9	Performance evaluation
9.1	Monitoring, measurement, analysis and evaluation	9.1.1.1 Monitoring and measurement of manufacturing processes9.1.1.2 Identification of statistical tools9.1.1.3 Application of statistical concepts 9.1.2.1 Customer satisfaction – Supplemental, Prioritization
9.2	Internal audit	9.2.2.1 Internal audit program9.2.2.2 Quality management system audit9.2.2.3 Manufacturing process audit 9.2.2.4Product audit
9.3	Management review	9.3.1.1 Management review – Supplemental9.3.2.1 Management review inputs – Supplemental 9.3.3.1 Management review outputs – Supplemental
10	Improvement
10.1	General
10.2	Nonconformity and corrective action	10.2.3 Problem solving10.2.4 Error-proofing10.2.5 Warranty management systems 10.2.6 Customer complaints and field failure test analysis
10.3	Continual improvement	10.3.1 Continual improvement – Supplemental

To fully understand the difference between ISO 9001 and IATF 16949, let’s begin with the most general observations. IATF 16949 was initially developed by a group of manufacturers to provide better products to automotive consumers.

By contrast, the scope of ISO 9001 is much broader, including over one million companies spanning various industries. Both standards, however, aim to improve the quality of a product with a customer focus. There are many similarities despite this apparent difference between ISO 9001 and IATF 16949.

To dig a bit deeper into the difference between ISO 9001 and IATF 16949, we want to explore the principles of ISO 9001 and IATF 16494 to get at their inherent differences. In what follows, you will learn:

The basic requirements of ISO 9001 and IATF 16949,
The critical focus areas of both criteria, and
Essential distinctions between both standards.

Basic Requirements of ISO 9001 and IATF 16949

While you might think that ISO 9001 and IATF 16494 are exclusive to each other, it turns out considerable overlap can be noted within their criteria requirements. In many cases, a company that observes both guidelines, like one in the automotive sector, will need to satisfy each standard. It helps that IATF 16949 is based on ISO 9001, but that doesn’t mean there isn’t a considerable difference between ISO 9001 and IARD 16949.

ISO 9001

Because ISO 9001 is a generic set of requirements intended to apply to any organization regardless of size or type of product, service, or process, the standard requires two fundamental things:

The organization needs to show it can consistently provide satisfying products and services to customers while conforming to regulations.
The enterprise must also aim to enhance satisfaction through continual improvement processes while conformity is assured.

These requirements are defined under eight sections for implementing a satisfactory quality management system. The most apparent difference between ISO 9001 and IATF 16949 is their specificity. In comparison, the IATF 16494 is more specific with its conditions since it focuses on producers in the automotive industry specifically.

IATF 16949

The IATF 16949 applies to automotive producers that want to improve customer experience through quality management principles.

This is an essential difference between ISO 9001 and IATF 16949 (which we will touch on later in this article). The requirements of IATF 16949 are supplemental to the ISO 9001. One is derived from the other, with the ISO 9001 standard forming the base requirements for any quality management system. Let’s dig into the scope of IATF 16949 requirements.

The requirements of IATF 16949 focus on these critical areas:

Continual process improvement,
Effective defect prevention,
Waste-reducing practices,
Proven product safety,
Industry risk management,
Planning for contingency and even
Management of lower-level suppliers.

You’ll see that demonstrating these elements in your own quality management system and practices is much more detailed than the general ISO 9001 conditions.

Key Focus Areas of ISO 9001 and IATF 16949

Since IATF 16494 is based on ISO 9001, it’s apparent that there would be considerable similarity in requirements. Both emphasize the following focus areas: organizational context, leadership, planning, support, operation, evaluation, and improvement.

Organizational Context

Contextualizing your organization’s operations means understanding the needs and expectations of all interested parties.

Leadership

Under leadership, both standards establish the need for commitment and clearly outlined policies, organizational roles, and final authorities.

Planning

The planning section outlines how actions address opportunities as well as risks. There are clear quality objectives and plans to achieve them through systematic changes.

Support

To consider support, both standards place a heavy burden on companies to achieve resources, competence, and awareness. This means training, audits, and even employee empowerment.

Operation

Here we include conditions for products, services, and design and development. This means consideration of operational planning, manufacturing processes, design validation, prototype management, and outputs.

Evaluation

Monitoring, analysis, and measurement are essential in the evaluation section of these standards. They demand an internal audit and management review for all products and processes. It’s here that you would identify statistical tools of analysis of customer satisfaction as well.

Improvement

Finally, improvement deals with nonconformity issues and the need for corrective action to produce incremental change and advancement. This step entails error-proofing and dealing with customer feedback and complaints.

Essential Difference between ISO 9001 and IATF 16949

In essence, IATF 16949 is a quality management standard specifically for the automotive sector but still fulfills the essential criteria of ISO 9001. IATF 16949 was created to synchronize certification worldwide for all automotive supply chains and assessments. Interestingly, however, the IATF is a document that would not exist without ISO 9001. This primary difference between ISO 9001 and IATF 16949 should be understood.

As we have noted before, the conditions and criteria of IATF 16949 must be implemented in conjunction with ISO 9001, making it an additional set of requirements. This signals a crucial difference between ISO 9001 and IATF 16949 even when both systems have the essential function of improving experiences, products, and processes.

Learn more about ISO 9001 and IATF 16949 Differences

While this introductory comparison is instructive for learning more about the structure, requirements, and goals of these two essential sets of criteria, there may be a need to learn more from more experienced quality management professionals about the difference between ISO 9001 and IATF 16949.

Contact Sync Resource today for a consultation on how you can meet quality standards, and see how we can improve your practices to stimulate constant and incremental improvement to satisfaction and services.