Can jenny evaluate this business project by assuming just a one-time purchase? why or why not? what other evaluation methods should jenny use?

Skip to main content

  1. Possibly. Students have the responsibility of protecting their work from being used dishonestly. If another student makes use of your work even without your knowledge, you may still bear some responsibility for inadvertently helping another student to cheat. Your responsibility or exoneration would depend on how negligent you were about protecting your work. Certainly, if a student goes to great lengths to steal your work despite all reasonable precautions taken by you, you would not be found responsible for aiding a dishonest act. However, you should always keep your work to yourself as much as possible. Lending a friend a paper so that he can use it as a guide to writing his own, for instance, may implicate you in academic dishonesty if your friend uses your ideas, phrases, or passages in his paper, even if you never encouraged him to do so. It is never wise to share your work with others when collaboration is not allowed, and it is a violation of the Academic Honesty Policy to share completed assignments in a form that can be copied.
  1. Yes. Improper storage of prohibited notes, course materials, and study aids during an exam such that they are accessible or possible to view is a violation of the Academic Honesty Policy. Always make sure that any notes or study aids that you bring to an exam are safely stowed away in closed bags kept well out of view.
  1. Yes. You are responsible for correctly citing all ideas, phrases, and passages taken from other authors wherever they occur in your work, even in drafts of your papers. Failure to do so is plagiarism, a violation of the Academic Honesty Policy.
  1. Yes, in almost all instances. Once a charge of academic dishonesty has been brought, you must remain enrolled in the class unless the case is resolved in one of the following two ways:
    1. If you have signed an Instructor Resolution Warning Letter offered by your instructor, you may drop or withdraw from the course once the Warning Letter has been approved by the Board on Academic Honesty.
    2. If you are exonerated by the Board after a hearing, then you may drop or withdraw from the course. If you withdraw before your case is resolved or after you are found responsible under either the Instructor Resolution with Penalty process or Board Resolution process, you will be reinstated in the class.

No matter how difficult it is to stay in a course in which the professor has accused you of dishonesty, you must continue to attend class and fulfill all class obligations.

  1. Yes. You are responsible for correctly citing all ideas, phrases, and passages taken from other authors wherever they occur in your work, even in drafts of your papers. Failure to do so is plagiarism, a violation of the Academic Honesty Policy.
  1. Yes. It is a good idea to have others proofread your work to identify mistakes in spelling, punctuation, syntax and style, unless such proofreading is expressly prohibited. But you are being dishonest for claiming authorship of any content added by your friend. Your instructor would have every right to turn you over to the board if she suspects that you received unauthorized aid in fulfilling the assignment.
  1. Yes. Sharing permission codes with other students is the same as forging signatures or falsifying information on official academic documents such as drop/add forms, petitions, letters of permission, or any other official University document and is a violation of the Academic Honesty Policy.
  1. No. This is called “duplicate submission.” Students are expected to produce original work for all of their classes. Turning in an essay written for a different class is dishonest not only because you are misrepresenting it as work done for this class, but also because you have received a grade and critical input from your former instructor, thus giving you an unfair advantage over your classmates. Many times, however, you can use a former assignment as the basis for a new one. Confer with your instructor, show her the paper and discuss how you might develop the work in a way that can satisfy class requirements. It is ultimately your instructor’s decision whether it is appropriate to use work done in a different class for her course.
  1. Yes. In classes where collaboration on graded assignments is allowed, you must still do your own work. Always make sure you understand the extent of collaboration your instructor allows. If you are not sure, ask your instructor for clarification. Most instructors do not allow students to turn in identical work or assignments that contain identical work.
  1. No. No faculty member can punish you for alleged dishonesty without following the procedures outlined in the Academic Honesty Policy. The instructor can follow the Instructor Resolution with Penalty process by presenting you with the evidence of dishonesty, suggesting a penalty, referring you to the Academic Honesty Policy, and allowing you up to 48 hours to accept the penalty. Or he can turn the case over to the board for a hearing in a Board Resolution. He cannot punish you on his own. In a similar vein, no faculty member can “give you a break” and overlook an instance of academic dishonesty, as all University faculty and staff are obligated to report cases of suspected dishonesty to the board.
  1. No. This is called “facilitating academic dishonesty” and includes aiding another person in an act that violates the standards of academic honesty; allowing other students to look at one's own work during an exam or in an assignment where collaboration is not allowed; providing information, material, or assistance to another person in violation of course, departmental, or College academic honesty policies; and providing false information in connection with any academic honesty inquiry.
  1. No. Using automatic translation programs is the same as getting a friend to do your work for you and is dishonest.

Net present value (NPV) is the difference between the present value of cash inflows and the present value of cash outflows over a period of time. NPV is used in capital budgeting and investment planning to analyze the profitability of a projected investment or project. NPV is the result of calculations used to find the current value of a future stream of payments.

  • Net present value, or NPV, is used to calculate the current value of a future stream of payments from a company, project, or investment.
  • To calculate NPV, you need to estimate the timing and amount of future cash flows and pick a discount rate equal to the minimum acceptable rate of return.
  • The discount rate may reflect your cost of capital or the returns available on alternative investments of comparable risk.
  • If the NPV of a project or investment is positive, it means its rate of return will be above the discount rate.

If there’s one cash flow from a project that will be paid one year from now, then the calculation for the NPV is as follows:

N P V = Cash flow ( 1 + i ) t − initial investment where: i = Required return or discount rate t = Number of time periods \begin{aligned} &NPV = \frac{\text{Cash flow}}{(1 + i)^t} - \text{initial investment} \\ &\textbf{where:}\\ &i=\text{Required return or discount rate}\\ &t=\text{Number of time periods}\\ \end{aligned} NPV=(1+i)tCash flowinitial investmentwhere:i=Required return or discount ratet=Number of time periods

If analyzing a longer-term project with multiple cash flows, then the formula for the NPV of a project is as follows:

N P V = ∑ t = 0 n R t ( 1 + i ) t where: R t = net cash inflow-outflows during a single period  t i = discount rate or return that could be earned in alternative investments t = number of time periods \begin{aligned} &NPV = \sum_{t = 0}^n \frac{R_t}{(1 + i)^t}\\ &\textbf{where:}\\ &R_t=\text{net cash inflow-outflows during a single period }t\\ &i=\text{discount rate or return that could be earned in alternative investments}\\ &t=\text{number of time periods}\\ \end{aligned} NPV=t=0n(1+i)tRtwhere:Rt=net cash inflow-outflows during a single period ti=discount rate or return that could be earned in alternative investmentst=number of time periods

If you are unfamiliar with summation notation, here is an easier way to remember the concept of NPV:

N P V = Today’s value of the expected cash flows − Today’s value of invested cash NPV = \text{Today’s value of the expected cash flows} - \text{Today’s value of invested cash} NPV=Today’s value of the expected cash flowsToday’s value of invested cash

NPV accounts for the time value of money and can be used to compare the rates of return of different projects, or to compare a projected rate of return with the hurdle rate required to approve an investment. The time value of money is represented in the NPV formula by the discount rate, which might be a hurdle rate for a project based on a company's cost of capital. No matter how the discount rate is determined, a negative NPV shows the expected rate of return will fall short of it, meaning the project will not create value.

In the context of evaluating corporate securities, the net present value calculation is often called discounted cash flow (DCF) analysis. It's the method Warren Buffett uses to compare the net present value of a company's discounted future cash flows with its current price.

The discount rate is central to the formula. It accounts for the fact that, so long as interest rates are positive, a dollar today is worth more than a dollar in the future. Inflation erodes the value of money over time. Meanwhile, today's dollar can be invested in a safe asset like government bonds; investments riskier than Treasuries must offer a higher rate of return. However it's determined, the discount rate is simply the baseline rate of return that a project must exceed to be worthwhile.

For example, an investor could receive $100 today or a year from now. Most investors would not be willing to postpone receiving $100 today. However, what if an investor could choose to receive $100 today or $105 in one year? The 5% rate of return might be worthwhile if comparable investments of equal risk offered less over the same period.

If, on the other hand, an investor could earn 8% with no risk over the next year, the offer of $105 in a year would not suffice. In this case, 8% would be the discount rate.

A positive NPV indicates that the projected earnings generated by a project or investment—discounted for their present value—exceed the anticipated costs, also in today's dollars. It is assumed that an investment with a positive NPV will be profitable.

An investment with a negative NPV will result in a net loss. This concept is the basis for the Net Present Value Rule, which says only investments with a positive NPV should be considered.

NPV can be calculated using tables, spreadsheets (for example, Excel), or financial calculators.

In Excel, there is a NPV function that can be used to easily calculate the net present value of a series of cash flows. The NPV function in Excel is simply NPV, and the full formula requirement is:

=NPV(discount rate, future cash flow) + initial investment

NPV Example, Excel.

In the example above, the formula entered into the gray NPV cell is:

=NPV(green cell, yellow cells) + blue cell

= NPV(C3, C6:C10) + C5

Imagine a company can invest in equipment that would cost $1 million and is expected to generate $25,000 a month in revenue for five years. Alternatively, the company could invest that money in securities with an expected annual return of 8%. Management views the equipment and securities as comparable investment risks.

There are two key steps for calculating the NPV of the investment in equipment:

Because the equipment is paid for upfront, this is the first cash flow included in the calculation. No elapsed time needs to be accounted for, so the immediate expenditure of $1 million doesn’t need to be discounted.

  • Identify the number of periods (t): The equipment is expected to generate monthly cash flow for five years, which means there will be 60 periods included in the calculation after multiplying the number of years of cash flows by the number of months in a year.
  • Identify the discount rate (i): The alternative investment is expected to return 8% per year. However, because the equipment generates a monthly stream of cash flows, the annual discount rate needs to be turned into a periodic, or monthly, compound rate. Using the following formula, we find that the periodic monthly compound rate is 0.64%.

Periodic Rate = ( ( 1 + 0.08 ) 1 12 ) − 1 = 0.64 % \text{Periodic Rate} = (( 1 + 0.08)^{\frac{1}{12}}) - 1 = 0.64\% Periodic Rate=((1+0.08)121)1=0.64%

Assume the monthly cash flows are earned at the end of the month, with the first payment arriving exactly one month after the equipment has been purchased. This is a future payment, so it needs to be adjusted for the time value of money. An investor can perform this calculation easily with a spreadsheet or calculator. To illustrate the concept, the first five payments are displayed in the table below.

Image by Sabrina Jiang © Investopedia 2020

The full calculation of the present value is equal to the present value of all 60 future cash flows, minus the $1,000,000 investment. The calculation could be more complicated if the equipment was expected to have any value left at the end of its life, but in this example, it is assumed to be worthless.

N P V = − $ 1 , 000 , 000 + ∑ t = 1 60 25 , 00 0 60 ( 1 + 0.0064 ) 60 NPV = -\$1,000,000 + \sum_{t = 1}^{60} \frac{25,000_{60}}{(1 + 0.0064)^{60}} NPV=$1,000,000+t=160(1+0.0064)6025,00060

That formula can be simplified to the following calculation:

N P V = − $ 1 , 000 , 000 + $ 1 , 242 , 322.82 = $ 242 , 322.82 NPV = -\$1,000,000 + \$1,242,322.82 = \$242,322.82 NPV=$1,000,000+$1,242,322.82=$242,322.82

In this case, the NPV is positive; the equipment should be purchased. If the present value of these cash flows had been negative because the discount rate was larger or the net cash flows were smaller, the investment would not have made sense.

A notable limitation of NPV analysis is that it makes assumptions about future events that may not prove correct. The discount rate value used is a judgment call, while the cost of an investment and its projected returns are necessarily estimates. The net present value calculation is only as reliable as its underlying assumptions.

The NPV formula yields a dollar result which, though easy to interpret, may not tell the entire story. Consider the following two investment options: Option A with an NPV of $100,000 or Option B with an NPV of $1,000.

Pros

  • Considers the time value of money

  • Incorporates discounted cash flow using a company's cost of capital

  • Returns a single dollar value that is relatively easy to interpret

  • May be easy to calculate when leveraging spreadsheets or financial calculators

Cons

  • Relies heavily on inputs, estimates, and long-term projections

  • Doesn't consider project size or ROI

  • May be hard to calculate manually, especially for projects with many years of cash flow

  • Is driven by quantitative inputs and does not consider non-financial metrics

Easy call, right? How about if Option A requires an initial investment of $1 million, while Option B will only cost $10? The extreme numbers in the example make a point. The NPV formula doesn't evaluate a project's return on investment (ROI), a key consideration for anyone with finite capital. Though the NPV formula estimates how much value a project will produce, it doesn't tell you whether it is an efficient use of your investment dollars.

The payback period, or payback method, is a simpler alternative to NPV. The payback method calculates how long it will take to recoup an investment. One drawback of this method is that it fails to account for the time value of money. For this reason, payback periods calculated for longer-term investments have a greater potential for inaccuracy.

Moreover, the payback period calculation does not concern itself with what happens once the investment costs are nominally recouped. An investment’s rate of return can change significantly over time. Comparisons using payback periods assume otherwise.

The internal rate of return (IRR) is calculated by solving the NPV formula for the discount rate required to make NPV equal zero. This method can be used to compare projects of different time spans on the basis of their projected return rates.

For example, IRR could be used to compare the anticipated profitability of a three-year project with that of a 10-year one. Although the IRR is useful for comparing rates of return, it may obscure the fact that the rate of return on the three-year project is only available for three years, and may not be matched once capital is reinvested.

Net present value (NPV) is a financial metric that seeks to capture the total value of an investment opportunity. The idea behind NPV is to project all of the future cash inflows and outflows associated with an investment, discount all those future cash flows to the present day, and then add them together. The resulting number after adding all the positive and negative cash flows together is the investment’s NPV. A positive NPV means that, after accounting for the time value of money, you will make money if you proceed with the investment.

NPV and IRR are closely related concepts, in that the IRR of an investment is the discount rate that would cause that investment to have an NPV of zero. Another way of thinking about this is that NPV and IRR are trying to answer two separate but related questions. For NPV, the question is, “What is the total amount of money I will make if I proceed with this investment, after taking into account the time value of money?” For IRR, the question is, “If I proceed with this investment, what would be the equivalent annual rate of return that I would receive?”

In theory, an NPV is “good” if it is greater than zero. After all, the NPV calculation already takes into account factors such as the investor’s cost of capital, opportunity cost, and risk tolerance through the discount rate. And the future cash flows of the project, together with the time value of money, are also captured. Therefore, even an NPV of $1 should theoretically qualify as “good,” indicating the project is worthwhile. In practice, since estimates used in the calculation are subject to error many planners will set a higher bar for NPV to give themselves an additional margin of safety.

NPV uses discounted cash flows to account for the time value of money. So long as interest rates are positive, a dollar today is worth more than a dollar tomorrow because a dollar today can earn an extra day's worth of interest. Even if future returns can be projected with certainty they must be discounted for the fact time must pass before they're realized, time during which a comparable sum could earn interest.

Video liên quan

Última postagem

Tag